Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB140 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/18/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 18, 2021       TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB140 by Rose (Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to prohibit imposition of the death penalty on a defendant who, at the time of the commission of the capital offense, had a severe mental illness. The bill would establish procedures for a defendant to have the opportunity to prove that he or she had a severe mental illness at the time of the offense and would require the jury to make the determination of severe mental illness at trial. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies.   Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH, WP, LBO, MW, DA, PBO, GDZ

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 18, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB140 by Rose (Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB140 by Rose (Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.), As Introduced

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB140 by Rose (Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.), As Introduced 

 HB140 by Rose (Relating to the applicability of the death penalty to a capital offense committed by a person with severe mental illness.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to prohibit imposition of the death penalty on a defendant who, at the time of the commission of the capital offense, had a severe mental illness. The bill would establish procedures for a defendant to have the opportunity to prove that he or she had a severe mental illness at the time of the offense and would require the jury to make the determination of severe mental illness at trial. Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be accomplished by utilizing existing resources.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies. 



This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies. 

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

212 Office of Court Admin, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH, WP, LBO, MW, DA, PBO, GDZ

JMc, DKN, BH, WP, LBO, MW, DA, PBO, GDZ