Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB1783 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/22/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             March 22, 2021       TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB1783 by White (Relating to the age of a child at which a juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over the child and to the minimum age of criminal responsibility.), As Introduced     Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1783, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($76,805,508) through the biennium ending August 31, 2023. Additional costs potentially associated with increased demand on juvenile probation programming are not included in this analysis and could be significant. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact toGeneral Revenue Related Funds2022($32,689,929)2023($44,115,579)2024($51,488,756)2025($63,207,736)2026($63,283,437)All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund12022($32,689,929)2023($44,115,579)2024($51,488,756)2025($63,207,736)2026($63,283,437) Fiscal AnalysisThe bill would amend various codes as they relate to the age of criminal responsibility and to certain substantive and procedural matters related to that age. Under the provisions of the bill, individuals who are 17 at offense would be considered juvenile and would be under the jurisdiction of juvenile courts and the juvenile justice system instead of the adult criminal justice system.  Juveniles under the age of 13 would not be under juvenile justice purview.  The provisions of the bill changing the age of criminal responsibility would take effect on September 1, 2021 and apply to offenses committed on or after the effective date of the Act.

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 22, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB1783 by White (Relating to the age of a child at which a juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over the child and to the minimum age of criminal responsibility.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1783 by White (Relating to the age of a child at which a juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over the child and to the minimum age of criminal responsibility.), As Introduced

 Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues

 Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB1783 by White (Relating to the age of a child at which a juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over the child and to the minimum age of criminal responsibility.), As Introduced 

 HB1783 by White (Relating to the age of a child at which a juvenile court may exercise jurisdiction over the child and to the minimum age of criminal responsibility.), As Introduced 



Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1783, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($76,805,508) through the biennium ending August 31, 2023. Additional costs potentially associated with increased demand on juvenile probation programming are not included in this analysis and could be significant. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB1783, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($76,805,508) through the biennium ending August 31, 2023. Additional costs potentially associated with increased demand on juvenile probation programming are not included in this analysis and could be significant. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

Additional costs potentially associated with increased demand on juvenile probation programming are not included in this analysis and could be significant. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.

General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact: 


2022 ($32,689,929)
2023 ($44,115,579)
2024 ($51,488,756)
2025 ($63,207,736)
2026 ($63,283,437)

All Funds, Five-Year Impact: 


2022 ($32,689,929)
2023 ($44,115,579)
2024 ($51,488,756)
2025 ($63,207,736)
2026 ($63,283,437)

 Fiscal Analysis

The bill would amend various codes as they relate to the age of criminal responsibility and to certain substantive and procedural matters related to that age. Under the provisions of the bill, individuals who are 17 at offense would be considered juvenile and would be under the jurisdiction of juvenile courts and the juvenile justice system instead of the adult criminal justice system.  Juveniles under the age of 13 would not be under juvenile justice purview.  The provisions of the bill changing the age of criminal responsibility would take effect on September 1, 2021 and apply to offenses committed on or after the effective date of the Act.

 Methodology

Sentencing trends in both the juvenile and adult justice systems were analyzed to determine the proportion of adult correctional institution, community supervision, and parole supervisions admissions who would be served by the juvenile justice system in the future.In fiscal year 2018, there were 116 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 70 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 26 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 20 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.In fiscal year 2019, there were 122 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 73 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 27 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 22 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.In fiscal year 2020, there were 68 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 41 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 15 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 12 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.In fiscal year 2018, 646 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 17 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments; in fiscal year 2019, 548 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 17 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments; and in fiscal year 2020, 411 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 18 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  Under the provisions of the bill, all of these individuals could be eligible to be placed on juvenile probation supervision.  This analysis assumes a portion, 67 percent, of these individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments and 34 percent would receive no supervision.  Estimated populations are based on the adult incarceration projections included in the January 2021 Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections report and juvenile justice system disposition trends.Savings are estimated based on the state costs per day for adults in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice correctional institutions ($69.27) and under adult community supervision ($2.13).  Adult parole supervision savings would not be realized within the first five years following passage.  Additional savings are estimated based on the state costs per day for juveniles in Texas Juvenile Justice Department state residential facilities ($616.70), on juvenile parole supervision ($50.55), on juvenile probation supervision ($3.90), and in juvenile detention ($18.66) and are based on the projections of the reduction in population for juveniles under age 13.  Costs are estimated based on the state costs per day for juveniles in Texas Juvenile Justice Department state residential facilities ($616.70), on juvenile parole supervision ($50.55), on juvenile probation supervision ($3.90), and in juvenile detention ($18.66).  Savings and costs are based on cost per day figures as reported in the January 2021 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost report.  This estimate assumes a small time lag before the first individuals enter the juvenile justice system after the bill becomes effective.  Based on current length of stay patterns, the bill assumes not all of those entering the juvenile justice system would complete their length of stay within the first year the bill is effective; therefore, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2022 would be approximately $32,689,929.  The cost estimate for fiscal year 2023 would be approximately $44,115,579, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2024 would be approximately $51,488,756, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2025 would be approximately $63,207,736, and the cost estimate for fiscal year 2026 would be approximately $63,283,437.  This analysis does not include potentially significant costs associated with probation programming such as mental health, substance abuse, or other specialized services, including placement in residential post-adjudication facilities.



In fiscal year 2018, there were 116 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 70 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 26 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 20 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.



In fiscal year 2019, there were 122 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 73 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 27 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 22 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.



In fiscal year 2020, there were 68 new admissions to adult correctional institutions for individuals who were 17 at offense and would be eligible for commitment to juvenile state residential facilities under the provisions of the bill.  This analysis assumes a portion, 60 percent or 41 of these individuals, will receive services in juvenile state residential facilities, 15 individuals would be certified as an adult, and 12 individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  This analysis also assumes a portion, 74 percent, of those admitted to juvenile state residential facilities would be subsequently released to juvenile parole supervision.



In fiscal year 2018, 646 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 17 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments; in fiscal year 2019, 548 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 17 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments; and in fiscal year 2020, 411 individuals were placed on adult felony community supervision who were 18 at offense and would be eligible to be supervised by juvenile probation departments.  Under the provisions of the bill, all of these individuals could be eligible to be placed on juvenile probation supervision.  This analysis assumes a portion, 67 percent, of these individuals would be supervised by juvenile probation departments and 34 percent would receive no supervision.  Estimated populations are based on the adult incarceration projections included in the January 2021 Adult and Juvenile Correctional Population Projections report and juvenile justice system disposition trends.



Savings are estimated based on the state costs per day for adults in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice correctional institutions ($69.27) and under adult community supervision ($2.13).  Adult parole supervision savings would not be realized within the first five years following passage.  Additional savings are estimated based on the state costs per day for juveniles in Texas Juvenile Justice Department state residential facilities ($616.70), on juvenile parole supervision ($50.55), on juvenile probation supervision ($3.90), and in juvenile detention ($18.66) and are based on the projections of the reduction in population for juveniles under age 13.  Costs are estimated based on the state costs per day for juveniles in Texas Juvenile Justice Department state residential facilities ($616.70), on juvenile parole supervision ($50.55), on juvenile probation supervision ($3.90), and in juvenile detention ($18.66).  Savings and costs are based on cost per day figures as reported in the January 2021 Criminal and Juvenile Justice Uniform Cost report.  This estimate assumes a small time lag before the first individuals enter the juvenile justice system after the bill becomes effective.  Based on current length of stay patterns, the bill assumes not all of those entering the juvenile justice system would complete their length of stay within the first year the bill is effective; therefore, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2022 would be approximately $32,689,929.  The cost estimate for fiscal year 2023 would be approximately $44,115,579, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2024 would be approximately $51,488,756, the cost estimate for fiscal year 2025 would be approximately $63,207,736, and the cost estimate for fiscal year 2026 would be approximately $63,283,437.  This analysis does not include potentially significant costs associated with probation programming such as mental health, substance abuse, or other specialized services, including placement in residential post-adjudication facilities.

 Local Government Impact

Williamson County Juvenile Services anticipates a significant fiscal impact of $1.6million in the FY 2022, and $.13 million each fiscal year thereafter. The increased costs are due to new required staff, increased medical and treatment services, increased operational needs, and other maintenance costs.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

212 Office of Court Admin, 644 Juvenile Justice Department, 696 Department of Criminal Justice

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, LM, MP

JMc, DKN, LM, MP