LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 13, 2021 TO: Honorable Chris Paddie, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2002 by Sanford (Relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness could be absorbed using existing resources. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 302 Office of the Attorney General, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement, 411 Commission on Fire Protection LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, SMAT, KFB, NA
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 13, 2021
TO: Honorable Chris Paddie, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2002 by Sanford (Relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Chris Paddie, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2002 by Sanford (Relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness.), As Introduced
Honorable Chris Paddie, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
Honorable Chris Paddie, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2002 by Sanford (Relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness.), As Introduced
HB2002 by Sanford (Relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to prohibited adverse employment action against certain first responders based on mental illness could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 302 Office of the Attorney General, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement, 411 Commission on Fire Protection
302 Office of the Attorney General, 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement, 411 Commission on Fire Protection
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, SMAT, KFB, NA
JMc, SMAT, KFB, NA