LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 7, 2021 TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB275 by Moody (Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedures to allow a court to grant a convicted person relief on an application for a writ of habeas corpus if the court finds that relevant scientific evidence not available at the time of the convicted person's trial would have resulted in a different punishment.According to the Office of Court Administration, while the number of additional writs that would be filed cannot be determined, the total is not anticipated to be significant and no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKn, MW, BH
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 7, 2021
TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB275 by Moody (Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB275 by Moody (Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.), As Introduced
Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB275 by Moody (Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.), As Introduced
HB275 by Moody (Relating to an application for a writ of habeas corpus based on certain relevant scientific evidence that was not available at the applicant's trial.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedures to allow a court to grant a convicted person relief on an application for a writ of habeas corpus if the court finds that relevant scientific evidence not available at the time of the convicted person's trial would have resulted in a different punishment.According to the Office of Court Administration, while the number of additional writs that would be filed cannot be determined, the total is not anticipated to be significant and no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.
According to the Office of Court Administration, while the number of additional writs that would be filed cannot be determined, the total is not anticipated to be significant and no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.
According to the Office of Court Administration, while the number of additional writs that would be filed cannot be determined, the total is not anticipated to be significant and no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin
212 Office of Court Admin
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKn, MW, BH
JMc, DKn, MW, BH