Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2950 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/12/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 12, 2021       TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2950 by Smith (Relating to the composition of and actions transferred by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Government Code to provide that the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation consists of five members designated from time to time by the Supreme Court of Texas. The bill would require members of the panel to be active, former, or retired court of appeals justices or active administrative judges.The bill would also provide that the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation may transfer civil actions involving one or more common questions of law or fact pending in the same court or different courts. The bill would provide that the judicial panel cannot transfer an action brought by the consumer protection division of the attorney general's officeBased on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and Office of the Attorney General, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the bill could be accomplished utilizing existing resources. In addition, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated with the implementation of the bill.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 302 Office of the Attorney General  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, SLE, BH, AF

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 12, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2950 by Smith (Relating to the composition of and actions transferred by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2950 by Smith (Relating to the composition of and actions transferred by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation.), As Introduced

 Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

 Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB2950 by Smith (Relating to the composition of and actions transferred by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation.), As Introduced 

 HB2950 by Smith (Relating to the composition of and actions transferred by the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Government Code to provide that the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation consists of five members designated from time to time by the Supreme Court of Texas. The bill would require members of the panel to be active, former, or retired court of appeals justices or active administrative judges.The bill would also provide that the judicial panel on multidistrict litigation may transfer civil actions involving one or more common questions of law or fact pending in the same court or different courts. The bill would provide that the judicial panel cannot transfer an action brought by the consumer protection division of the attorney general's officeBased on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and Office of the Attorney General, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the bill could be accomplished utilizing existing resources. In addition, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated with the implementation of the bill.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 302 Office of the Attorney General

212 Office of Court Admin, 302 Office of the Attorney General

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, SLE, BH, AF

JMc, SLE, BH, AF