LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 9, 2021 TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB3008 by Ramos (Relating to annulment of a marriage on the grounds of impotency.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Family Code to provide that a court may grant an annulment of a marriage to a party if either party was permanently impotent at the time of marriage, the petitioner did not know of the impotency at the time of marriage, and the petitioner ceased cohabitation with the other party within one year after the petitioner learned of the impotency and has not voluntarily cohabited with the other party since ceasing cohabitation. Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 9, 2021
TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB3008 by Ramos (Relating to annulment of a marriage on the grounds of impotency.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3008 by Ramos (Relating to annulment of a marriage on the grounds of impotency.), As Introduced
Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Honorable Victoria Neave, Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB3008 by Ramos (Relating to annulment of a marriage on the grounds of impotency.), As Introduced
HB3008 by Ramos (Relating to annulment of a marriage on the grounds of impotency.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Family Code to provide that a court may grant an annulment of a marriage to a party if either party was permanently impotent at the time of marriage, the petitioner did not know of the impotency at the time of marriage, and the petitioner ceased cohabitation with the other party within one year after the petitioner learned of the impotency and has not voluntarily cohabited with the other party since ceasing cohabitation. Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.
The bill would amend the Family Code to provide that a court may grant an annulment of a marriage to a party if either party was permanently impotent at the time of marriage, the petitioner did not know of the impotency at the time of marriage, and the petitioner ceased cohabitation with the other party within one year after the petitioner learned of the impotency and has not voluntarily cohabited with the other party since ceasing cohabitation.
Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin
212 Office of Court Admin
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH
JMc, DKN, BH