Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3521 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/19/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 18, 2021       TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB3521 by Hunter (Relating to the definition of coercion for purposes of trafficking of persons.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to the definition of coercion for trafficking of persons offenses. Under the provisions of the bill, the definition of coercion would be expanded to include certain circumstances that impairs the ability of a trafficked person with a chemical dependency to appraise the nature of or resist engaging in performing or providing labor or services. The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions would not result in a significant fiscal impact.  This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions would not result in a significant impact on the demand for state correctional resources.   Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, LM, SPA

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 18, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB3521 by Hunter (Relating to the definition of coercion for purposes of trafficking of persons.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3521 by Hunter (Relating to the definition of coercion for purposes of trafficking of persons.), As Introduced

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB3521 by Hunter (Relating to the definition of coercion for purposes of trafficking of persons.), As Introduced 

 HB3521 by Hunter (Relating to the definition of coercion for purposes of trafficking of persons.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to the definition of coercion for trafficking of persons offenses. Under the provisions of the bill, the definition of coercion would be expanded to include certain circumstances that impairs the ability of a trafficked person with a chemical dependency to appraise the nature of or resist engaging in performing or providing labor or services. The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions would not result in a significant fiscal impact.  This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions would not result in a significant impact on the demand for state correctional resources. 

The bill would amend the Penal Code as it relates to the definition of coercion for trafficking of persons offenses. Under the provisions of the bill, the definition of coercion would be expanded to include certain circumstances that impairs the ability of a trafficked person with a chemical dependency to appraise the nature of or resist engaging in performing or providing labor or services. 



The Office of Court Administration indicates the modifications outlined in the bill's provisions would not result in a significant fiscal impact.  This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions would not result in a significant impact on the demand for state correctional resources. 

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin

212 Office of Court Admin

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, LM, SPA

JMc, DKN, LM, SPA