Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB3820 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/29/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             March 29, 2021       TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB3820 by Klick (Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Family Code to require the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to refer cases for a specialty consultation in certain circumstances. DFPS would be allowed to object to a specialist and propose new specialists and work with the parent, guardian or attorney to select a specialist. The bill would also require the medical advisory board to assist DFPS in reviewing suspected cases of abuse or neglect and provide an independent evaluation in cases where the conclusion of the forensic assessment conflicts with the opinion of another qualified medical professional. Based on analysis of DFPS and the Department of State Health Services, this analysis assumes there would be a minimal cost associated with implementing the provisions of the bill that could be absorbed within current resources.     Local Government ImpactNo fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family & Protective Services, 537 State Health Services  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AKI, JLI, AN

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 29, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB3820 by Klick (Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB3820 by Klick (Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.), As Introduced

 Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services

 Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB3820 by Klick (Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.), As Introduced 

 HB3820 by Klick (Relating to health care specialty consultations in certain child abuse or neglect investigations and assessments.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend Family Code to require the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to refer cases for a specialty consultation in certain circumstances. DFPS would be allowed to object to a specialist and propose new specialists and work with the parent, guardian or attorney to select a specialist. The bill would also require the medical advisory board to assist DFPS in reviewing suspected cases of abuse or neglect and provide an independent evaluation in cases where the conclusion of the forensic assessment conflicts with the opinion of another qualified medical professional. Based on analysis of DFPS and the Department of State Health Services, this analysis assumes there would be a minimal cost associated with implementing the provisions of the bill that could be absorbed within current resources.   



The bill would also require the medical advisory board to assist DFPS in reviewing suspected cases of abuse or neglect and provide an independent evaluation in cases where the conclusion of the forensic assessment conflicts with the opinion of another qualified medical professional. 



Based on analysis of DFPS and the Department of State Health Services, this analysis assumes there would be a minimal cost associated with implementing the provisions of the bill that could be absorbed within current resources.   

 Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family & Protective Services, 537 State Health Services

530 Family & Protective Services, 537 State Health Services

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AKI, JLI, AN

JMc, AKI, JLI, AN