Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4346 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/22/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 22, 2021       TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB4346 by Leman (Relating to the possession, carrying, or transportation of a firearm by certain persons during the use of an easement.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Property Code to provide that an instrument granting an access easement or appurtenant easement may not restrict or prohibit an easement holder or easement holder's guest from possessing, carrying, or transporting a firearm while using the easement for the easement's purposes.The bill would prevent the owner of a servient estate from enforcing a restrictive covenant in an instrument granting an easement on the servient estate that restricts or prohibits the easement holder or easement holder's guest from possessing, carrying, or transporting a firearm while using the easement for the easement's purpose.Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 22, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB4346 by Leman (Relating to the possession, carrying, or transportation of a firearm by certain persons during the use of an easement.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted   

TO: Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB4346 by Leman (Relating to the possession, carrying, or transportation of a firearm by certain persons during the use of an easement.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety

 Honorable James White, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security & Public Safety

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB4346 by Leman (Relating to the possession, carrying, or transportation of a firearm by certain persons during the use of an easement.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted 

 HB4346 by Leman (Relating to the possession, carrying, or transportation of a firearm by certain persons during the use of an easement.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Property Code to provide that an instrument granting an access easement or appurtenant easement may not restrict or prohibit an easement holder or easement holder's guest from possessing, carrying, or transporting a firearm while using the easement for the easement's purposes.The bill would prevent the owner of a servient estate from enforcing a restrictive covenant in an instrument granting an easement on the servient estate that restricts or prohibits the easement holder or easement holder's guest from possessing, carrying, or transporting a firearm while using the easement for the easement's purpose.Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.This analysis assumes implementing the provisions of the bill would not result in a significant impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin

212 Office of Court Admin

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH

JMc, DKN, BH