Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB775 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/24/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             March 24, 2021       TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB775 by Walle (Relating to the adoption of noise regulations by certain counties; creating a criminal offense; authorizing fees.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Local Government Code to require the commissioners court of a county with a population of more than 3.3 million to prohibit the production of loudspeaker or amplifier sounds exceeding 85 decibels at a distance 50 feet from the property line on which the loudspeaker or sound amplifier is operated. A violation of the prohibition would be a Class C misdemeanor.According to the Office of Court Administration, no significant impact to the state court system is anticipated.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $500. In addition to the fine, punishment can include up to 180 days of deferred disposition. Costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, CMA, ANE

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 24, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB775 by Walle (Relating to the adoption of noise regulations by certain counties; creating a criminal offense; authorizing fees.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB775 by Walle (Relating to the adoption of noise regulations by certain counties; creating a criminal offense; authorizing fees.), As Introduced

 Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs

 Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB775 by Walle (Relating to the adoption of noise regulations by certain counties; creating a criminal offense; authorizing fees.), As Introduced 

 HB775 by Walle (Relating to the adoption of noise regulations by certain counties; creating a criminal offense; authorizing fees.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend Local Government Code to require the commissioners court of a county with a population of more than 3.3 million to prohibit the production of loudspeaker or amplifier sounds exceeding 85 decibels at a distance 50 feet from the property line on which the loudspeaker or sound amplifier is operated. A violation of the prohibition would be a Class C misdemeanor.According to the Office of Court Administration, no significant impact to the state court system is anticipated.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $500. In addition to the fine, punishment can include up to 180 days of deferred disposition. Costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact.



A Class C misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $500. In addition to the fine, punishment can include up to 180 days of deferred disposition. Costs associated with enforcement and prosecution could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal impact.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin

212 Office of Court Admin

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, CMA, ANE

JMc, AF, CMA, ANE