Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas House Bill HB834 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/05/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 5, 2021       TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB834 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony in a criminal case involving a controlled substance.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to prohibit the conviction of a defendant for all Health and Safety Code controlled substances offenses based on the testimony of an undercover law enforcement officer or person acting under the color of law enforcement without sufficient corroboration of that officer or actor's testimony. Currently, corroboration is only required when the undercover individual is not a licensed peace officer or a special investigator.The change would apply to any case in which a judgment is entered on or after the effective date of the bill.  A case in which a judgment is entered before the effective date of the bill would be governed by law in effect on the date the judgment was entered, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.  Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH, AF

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 5, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB834 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony in a criminal case involving a controlled substance.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB834 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony in a criminal case involving a controlled substance.), As Introduced

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Honorable Nicole Collier, Chair, House Committee on Criminal Jurisprudence

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB834 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony in a criminal case involving a controlled substance.), As Introduced 

 HB834 by Thompson, Senfronia (Relating to requiring the corroboration of certain testimony in a criminal case involving a controlled substance.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Code of Criminal Procedure to prohibit the conviction of a defendant for all Health and Safety Code controlled substances offenses based on the testimony of an undercover law enforcement officer or person acting under the color of law enforcement without sufficient corroboration of that officer or actor's testimony. Currently, corroboration is only required when the undercover individual is not a licensed peace officer or a special investigator.The change would apply to any case in which a judgment is entered on or after the effective date of the bill.  A case in which a judgment is entered before the effective date of the bill would be governed by law in effect on the date the judgment was entered, and the former law is continued in effect for that purpose.  Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated as a result from implementing the provisions of the bill.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin

212 Office of Court Admin

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DKN, BH, AF

JMc, DKN, BH, AF