Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB1349 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/11/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 11, 2021       TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: SB1349 by Eckhardt (Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Family Code related to require, at each placement review hearing after the second anniversary of the date the court rendered the final order naming the department or another person as the child's managing conservator without terminating parental rights, the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to review the child's placement to determine whether the child could be returned to the child's parent if the parent was named possessory conservator for the child in the final order. The bill would allow the court to return the child to the child's parents if the court finds it is in the best interest of the child.Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and DFPS, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the bill could be accomplished utilizing available resources. In addition, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated with the implementation of the bill.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 530 Family & Protective Services  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AKI, BH

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 11, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: SB1349 by Eckhardt (Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1349 by Eckhardt (Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.), As Introduced

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services

 Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 SB1349 by Eckhardt (Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.), As Introduced 

 SB1349 by Eckhardt (Relating to placing a child in the possessory conservatorship of the child's parents in certain situations.), As Introduced 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend the Family Code related to require, at each placement review hearing after the second anniversary of the date the court rendered the final order naming the department or another person as the child's managing conservator without terminating parental rights, the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS) to review the child's placement to determine whether the child could be returned to the child's parent if the parent was named possessory conservator for the child in the final order. The bill would allow the court to return the child to the child's parents if the court finds it is in the best interest of the child.Based on the analysis of the Office of Court Administration and DFPS, it is assumed that duties and responsibilities associated with implementing the bill could be accomplished utilizing available resources. In addition, no significant fiscal impact to the state court system is anticipated with the implementation of the bill.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Admin, 530 Family & Protective Services

212 Office of Court Admin, 530 Family & Protective Services

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AKI, BH

JMc, AKI, BH