LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 10, 2021 TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB504 by Miles (Relating to authority of certain county fire marshals to inspect group homes; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend the Local Government Code to provide for the authority of a certain county fire marshal to inspect group homes and to require the fire marshal to order remedial action if the marshal finds that certain dangerous conditions exist. Failure to comply with such an order would be a Class B misdemeanor offense, unless it were shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times for the same offense, in which event the offense would be a state jail felony.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies and that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.A Class B misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $2,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days, or both. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication. Source Agencies: b > td > 529 Hlth & Human Svcs Comm LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, CMA, ANE
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 10, 2021
TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB504 by Miles (Relating to authority of certain county fire marshals to inspect group homes; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB504 by Miles (Relating to authority of certain county fire marshals to inspect group homes; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.), As Engrossed
Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
Honorable Garnet Coleman, Chair, House Committee on County Affairs
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB504 by Miles (Relating to authority of certain county fire marshals to inspect group homes; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.), As Engrossed
SB504 by Miles (Relating to authority of certain county fire marshals to inspect group homes; authorizing a fee; creating a criminal offense.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend the Local Government Code to provide for the authority of a certain county fire marshal to inspect group homes and to require the fire marshal to order remedial action if the marshal finds that certain dangerous conditions exist. Failure to comply with such an order would be a Class B misdemeanor offense, unless it were shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times for the same offense, in which event the offense would be a state jail felony.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies and that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Failure to comply with such an order would be a Class B misdemeanor offense, unless it were shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times for the same offense, in which event the offense would be a state jail felony.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies and that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Failure to comply with such an order would be a Class B misdemeanor offense, unless it were shown on the trial of the offense that the defendant has been previously convicted two or more times for the same offense, in which event the offense would be a state jail felony.This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies and that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
This analysis assumes the provisions of the bill addressing felony sanctions for criminal offenses would not result in a significant impact on state correctional agencies and that any costs associated with the bill could be absorbed using existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.A Class B misdemeanor is punishable by a fine of not more than $2,000, confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days, or both. Costs associated with enforcement, prosecution and confinement could likely be absorbed within existing resources. Revenue gain from fines imposed and collected is not anticipated to have a significant fiscal implication.
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 529 Hlth & Human Svcs Comm
529 Hlth & Human Svcs Comm
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, CMA, ANE
JMc, AF, CMA, ANE