Texas 2021 87th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB69 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/26/2021

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             May 26, 2021       TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: SB69 by Miles (Relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest.), As Passed 2nd House     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest could be absorbed using existing resources.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, LBO, DKN, KFB, NA, SLE, AF

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 87TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 26, 2021

 

 

  TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: SB69 by Miles (Relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest.), As Passed 2nd House   

TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB69 by Miles (Relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest.), As Passed 2nd House

 Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate

 Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 SB69 by Miles (Relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest.), As Passed 2nd House 

 SB69 by Miles (Relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest.), As Passed 2nd House 



No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

It is assumed that the costs associated with the bill's provisions relating to prohibiting peace officers from using neck restraints during a search or arrest could be absorbed using existing resources.

 Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement

405 Department of Public Safety, 407 Law Enforcement

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, LBO, DKN, KFB, NA, SLE, AF

JMc, LBO, DKN, KFB, NA, SLE, AF