LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 9, 2023 TO: Honorable Craig Goldman, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB1336 by Darby (Relating to the ownership by a landowner of the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.), As Introduced The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease related to land owned by the Permanent School Fund is unknown. The bill would amend Chapter 141 of the Natural Resources Code as it relates to the Ownership of Geothermal Energy and Associated Resources. The bill would establish that a landowner owns the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land as real property and that those property rights entitle the landowner and select others to drill for and produce geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.Based on information provided by the Railroad Commission and the Commission on Environmental Quality, it is assumed that costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. The General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board (GLO) has historically considered geothermal energy as belonging to the mineral estate. According to the GLO, the Permanent School Fund (PSF) owns approximately 6.3 million acres of Relinquishment Act lands. Based on the analysis of the agency, if geothermal is under a tract of this land, where the PSF owns the minerals but not the surface, a loss could be realized under the provisions of the bill for future geothermal value to the PSF in the form of bonus, rental, and royalties that would have been paid under a geothermal lease on its mineral estate. The fiscal implications cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease is unknown. Local Government ImpactNo fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board, 455 Railroad Commission, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, MW, EJ, MOc, CMA, DKN
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 9, 2023
TO: Honorable Craig Goldman, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB1336 by Darby (Relating to the ownership by a landowner of the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Craig Goldman, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB1336 by Darby (Relating to the ownership by a landowner of the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.), As Introduced
Honorable Craig Goldman, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources
Honorable Craig Goldman, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB1336 by Darby (Relating to the ownership by a landowner of the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.), As Introduced
HB1336 by Darby (Relating to the ownership by a landowner of the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.), As Introduced
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease related to land owned by the Permanent School Fund is unknown.
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease related to land owned by the Permanent School Fund is unknown.
The bill would amend Chapter 141 of the Natural Resources Code as it relates to the Ownership of Geothermal Energy and Associated Resources. The bill would establish that a landowner owns the geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land as real property and that those property rights entitle the landowner and select others to drill for and produce geothermal energy and associated resources below the surface of the landowner's land.Based on information provided by the Railroad Commission and the Commission on Environmental Quality, it is assumed that costs associated with implementing the provisions of the bill could be absorbed using existing resources. The General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board (GLO) has historically considered geothermal energy as belonging to the mineral estate. According to the GLO, the Permanent School Fund (PSF) owns approximately 6.3 million acres of Relinquishment Act lands. Based on the analysis of the agency, if geothermal is under a tract of this land, where the PSF owns the minerals but not the surface, a loss could be realized under the provisions of the bill for future geothermal value to the PSF in the form of bonus, rental, and royalties that would have been paid under a geothermal lease on its mineral estate. The fiscal implications cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease is unknown.
The General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board (GLO) has historically considered geothermal energy as belonging to the mineral estate. According to the GLO, the Permanent School Fund (PSF) owns approximately 6.3 million acres of Relinquishment Act lands. Based on the analysis of the agency, if geothermal is under a tract of this land, where the PSF owns the minerals but not the surface, a loss could be realized under the provisions of the bill for future geothermal value to the PSF in the form of bonus, rental, and royalties that would have been paid under a geothermal lease on its mineral estate. The fiscal implications cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease is unknown.
The General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board (GLO) has historically considered geothermal energy as belonging to the mineral estate. According to the GLO, the Permanent School Fund (PSF) owns approximately 6.3 million acres of Relinquishment Act lands. Based on the analysis of the agency, if geothermal is under a tract of this land, where the PSF owns the minerals but not the surface, a loss could be realized under the provisions of the bill for future geothermal value to the PSF in the form of bonus, rental, and royalties that would have been paid under a geothermal lease on its mineral estate. The fiscal implications cannot be determined because the timing and amount of the loss of value of any current or future geothermal assets that would have been paid under a geothermal lease is unknown.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board, 455 Railroad Commission, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
305 General Land Office and Veterans' Land Board, 455 Railroad Commission, 582 Commission on Environmental Quality
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, AF, MW, EJ, MOc, CMA, DKN
JMc, AF, MW, EJ, MOc, CMA, DKN