LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 17, 2023 TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2249 by Metcalf (Relating to the selection and administration of an appraisal review board in certain counties; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Chapter 6 of the Tax Code (Local Property Tax Administration) to provide that an appraisal review board consist of three members elected by the voters of the county in which the district is established at the general election of state and county officers. The bill would provide term lengths, vacancy and removal procedures, eligibility requirements, ballot procedures, and filing fees for an appraisal review board election.The bill would make conforming repeals and amendments in the Tax Code and various other codes.The bill would not affect taxable property values, tax rates, collection rates, or any other variable that might affect the property tax revenues of units of local government or cost to the state; filing fee collections deposited to county general funds is unlikely to be significant. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.The provisions would only apply to a county that has a population of more than 400,000 and is adjacent to a county with a population of more than 3.3 million and no other counties with a population of more than 300,000. This description would apply to Montgomery County. Source Agencies: b > td > 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, SD, BRI
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 17, 2023
TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2249 by Metcalf (Relating to the selection and administration of an appraisal review board in certain counties; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2249 by Metcalf (Relating to the selection and administration of an appraisal review board in certain counties; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced
Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2249 by Metcalf (Relating to the selection and administration of an appraisal review board in certain counties; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced
HB2249 by Metcalf (Relating to the selection and administration of an appraisal review board in certain counties; authorizing a fee.), As Introduced
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would amend Chapter 6 of the Tax Code (Local Property Tax Administration) to provide that an appraisal review board consist of three members elected by the voters of the county in which the district is established at the general election of state and county officers. The bill would provide term lengths, vacancy and removal procedures, eligibility requirements, ballot procedures, and filing fees for an appraisal review board election.The bill would make conforming repeals and amendments in the Tax Code and various other codes.The bill would not affect taxable property values, tax rates, collection rates, or any other variable that might affect the property tax revenues of units of local government or cost to the state; filing fee collections deposited to county general funds is unlikely to be significant.
The bill would not affect taxable property values, tax rates, collection rates, or any other variable that might affect the property tax revenues of units of local government or cost to the state; filing fee collections deposited to county general funds is unlikely to be significant.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.The provisions would only apply to a county that has a population of more than 400,000 and is adjacent to a county with a population of more than 3.3 million and no other counties with a population of more than 300,000. This description would apply to Montgomery County.
The provisions would only apply to a county that has a population of more than 400,000 and is adjacent to a county with a population of more than 3.3 million and no other counties with a population of more than 300,000. This description would apply to Montgomery County.
Source Agencies: b > td > 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
304 Comptroller of Public Accounts
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, SD, BRI
JMc, KK, SD, BRI