Texas 2023 88th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2711 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 05/05/2023

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             May 5, 2023       TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2711 by Smithee (relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a hotel occupancy tax and the applicability and rates of that tax in certain counties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted     No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would amend Chapter 352 of the Tax Code, regarding county hotel occupancy taxes.The bill would amend Section 352.002 by adding Subsection (v) to authorize the commissioner's court of a county with a population of less than 3,000, that does not border another state, and that is adjacent to a county that contains a portion of Lake Meredith and has a population of more than 110,000 to impose a hotel occupancy tax.The bill would amend Section 352.003 by adding Subsection (bb) to state that the tax rate in a county authorized to impose the tax under Section 352.002(v) may not exceed 7.0 percent of the price of a room and that it may not exceed 2.0 percent if the hotel is located a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax or the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax.The bill would have no state revenue implications.  Local Government ImpactThis bill would affect Armstrong County.  Source Agencies: b > td >   LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, BRI, MOc, SD

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 5, 2023

 

 

  TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2711 by Smithee (relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a hotel occupancy tax and the applicability and rates of that tax in certain counties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted   

TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2711 by Smithee (relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a hotel occupancy tax and the applicability and rates of that tax in certain counties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

 Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means

 Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB2711 by Smithee (relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a hotel occupancy tax and the applicability and rates of that tax in certain counties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted 

 HB2711 by Smithee (relating to the authority of certain counties to impose a hotel occupancy tax and the applicability and rates of that tax in certain counties.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted 



No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would amend Chapter 352 of the Tax Code, regarding county hotel occupancy taxes.The bill would amend Section 352.002 by adding Subsection (v) to authorize the commissioner's court of a county with a population of less than 3,000, that does not border another state, and that is adjacent to a county that contains a portion of Lake Meredith and has a population of more than 110,000 to impose a hotel occupancy tax.The bill would amend Section 352.003 by adding Subsection (bb) to state that the tax rate in a county authorized to impose the tax under Section 352.002(v) may not exceed 7.0 percent of the price of a room and that it may not exceed 2.0 percent if the hotel is located a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax or the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax.The bill would have no state revenue implications.



The bill would amend Section 352.003 by adding Subsection (bb) to state that the tax rate in a county authorized to impose the tax under Section 352.002(v) may not exceed 7.0 percent of the price of a room and that it may not exceed 2.0 percent if the hotel is located a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax or the extraterritorial jurisdiction of a municipality that imposes a municipal hotel occupancy tax.The bill would have no state revenue implications.

 Local Government Impact

This bill would affect Armstrong County.

Source Agencies: b > td >



LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, BRI, MOc, SD

JMc, KK, BRI, MOc, SD