LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 14, 2023 TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2969 by Cook (Relating to prohibiting a maximum age or age differential for prospective adoptive parents.), As Engrossed No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would prohibit the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), a single source continuum contractor, or a child placing agency from implementing a maximum age for a prospective adoptive parent and maximum age differential between a child and a prospective adoptive parent. It is assumed any costs to DFPS could be absorbed within existing resources. Local Government ImpactNo fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, DDel, ER, AN
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 14, 2023
TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB2969 by Cook (Relating to prohibiting a maximum age or age differential for prospective adoptive parents.), As Engrossed
TO: Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2969 by Cook (Relating to prohibiting a maximum age or age differential for prospective adoptive parents.), As Engrossed
Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
Honorable Lois W. Kolkhorst, Chair, Senate Committee on Health & Human Services
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB2969 by Cook (Relating to prohibiting a maximum age or age differential for prospective adoptive parents.), As Engrossed
HB2969 by Cook (Relating to prohibiting a maximum age or age differential for prospective adoptive parents.), As Engrossed
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would prohibit the Department of Family and Protective Services (DFPS), a single source continuum contractor, or a child placing agency from implementing a maximum age for a prospective adoptive parent and maximum age differential between a child and a prospective adoptive parent. It is assumed any costs to DFPS could be absorbed within existing resources.
It is assumed any costs to DFPS could be absorbed within existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, DDel, ER, AN
JMc, NPe, DDel, ER, AN