LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 24, 2023 TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB4163 by Gervin-Hawkins (Relating to an external audit of investigations conducted by the Department of Family and Protective Services; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced Implementing the provisions of the bill utilizing existing resources would likely result in an equal reduction of appropriations in other functions at the agency. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to unknown cost to implement the recommendations in the audit report. The bill would require the Department of Family and Protective Services to pay costs associated with an audit using existing resources. The bill would also require DFPS to implement all audit recommendations within 90 days after receiving the audit report.According to the agency, each audit would cost between $150,000 to $200,000. If the agency is unable to implement the recommendations then the agency would be required to conduct subsequent audits until the recommendations are implemented. The agency cannot determine how many audits would be conducted. The component of the bill relating to implementing the recommendations of the auditor's report cannot be determined due to the unknown amounts of resources needed to implement the recommendations.This analysis acknowledges that implementing the provisions of the bill within existing resources would reduced appropriations for existing function at the agency in an equal amount. In addition, this analysis cannot determine where the $500 civil penalty would be deposited or the mechanism in which the legislature or governor would issue the penalty. This analysis assumes no fiscal impact to the Comptroller of Public Accountants and the Office of Court Administration. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, ER, AN, NV
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 24, 2023
TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB4163 by Gervin-Hawkins (Relating to an external audit of investigations conducted by the Department of Family and Protective Services; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB4163 by Gervin-Hawkins (Relating to an external audit of investigations conducted by the Department of Family and Protective Services; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Honorable James B. Frank, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB4163 by Gervin-Hawkins (Relating to an external audit of investigations conducted by the Department of Family and Protective Services; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
HB4163 by Gervin-Hawkins (Relating to an external audit of investigations conducted by the Department of Family and Protective Services; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
Implementing the provisions of the bill utilizing existing resources would likely result in an equal reduction of appropriations in other functions at the agency. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to unknown cost to implement the recommendations in the audit report.
Implementing the provisions of the bill utilizing existing resources would likely result in an equal reduction of appropriations in other functions at the agency. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to unknown cost to implement the recommendations in the audit report.
Implementing the provisions of the bill utilizing existing resources would likely result in an equal reduction of appropriations in other functions at the agency. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to unknown cost to implement the recommendations in the audit report.
The bill would require the Department of Family and Protective Services to pay costs associated with an audit using existing resources. The bill would also require DFPS to implement all audit recommendations within 90 days after receiving the audit report.According to the agency, each audit would cost between $150,000 to $200,000. If the agency is unable to implement the recommendations then the agency would be required to conduct subsequent audits until the recommendations are implemented. The agency cannot determine how many audits would be conducted. The component of the bill relating to implementing the recommendations of the auditor's report cannot be determined due to the unknown amounts of resources needed to implement the recommendations.This analysis acknowledges that implementing the provisions of the bill within existing resources would reduced appropriations for existing function at the agency in an equal amount. In addition, this analysis cannot determine where the $500 civil penalty would be deposited or the mechanism in which the legislature or governor would issue the penalty. This analysis assumes no fiscal impact to the Comptroller of Public Accountants and the Office of Court Administration.
The bill would require the Department of Family and Protective Services to pay costs associated with an audit using existing resources. The bill would also require DFPS to implement all audit recommendations within 90 days after receiving the audit report.
According to the agency, each audit would cost between $150,000 to $200,000. If the agency is unable to implement the recommendations then the agency would be required to conduct subsequent audits until the recommendations are implemented. The agency cannot determine how many audits would be conducted.
This analysis acknowledges that implementing the provisions of the bill within existing resources would reduced appropriations for existing function at the agency in an equal amount.
In addition, this analysis cannot determine where the $500 civil penalty would be deposited or the mechanism in which the legislature or governor would issue the penalty.
This analysis assumes no fiscal impact to the Comptroller of Public Accountants and the Office of Court Administration.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, ER, AN, NV
JMc, NPe, ER, AN, NV