LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION March 29, 2023 TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB698 by Neave Criado (Relating to the remote participation of certain persons in a proceeding for the issuance or modification of a protective order.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB698, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($672,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2025. General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact toGeneral Revenue Related Funds2024($336,000)2025($336,000)2026($336,000)2027($336,000)2028($336,000)All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable (Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund12024($336,000)2025($336,000)2026($336,000)2027($336,000)2028($336,000) Fiscal AnalysisThe bill would amend the Family Code to require a court, upon written request, to provide a method for protective order applicants and witnesses to participate remotely in a hearing on the application for a protective order. The bill would allow the court to deny the request if it makes a finding that there is good cause to do so. The bill would also apply to hearings on modifications of protective orders.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 29, 2023
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB698 by Neave Criado (Relating to the remote participation of certain persons in a proceeding for the issuance or modification of a protective order.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB698 by Neave Criado (Relating to the remote participation of certain persons in a proceeding for the issuance or modification of a protective order.), As Introduced
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB698 by Neave Criado (Relating to the remote participation of certain persons in a proceeding for the issuance or modification of a protective order.), As Introduced
HB698 by Neave Criado (Relating to the remote participation of certain persons in a proceeding for the issuance or modification of a protective order.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB698, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($672,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2025.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB698, As Introduced : a negative impact of ($672,000) through the biennium ending August 31, 2025.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
2024 ($336,000)
2025 ($336,000)
2026 ($336,000)
2027 ($336,000)
2028 ($336,000)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
2024 ($336,000)
2025 ($336,000)
2026 ($336,000)
2027 ($336,000)
2028 ($336,000)
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Family Code to require a court, upon written request, to provide a method for protective order applicants and witnesses to participate remotely in a hearing on the application for a protective order. The bill would allow the court to deny the request if it makes a finding that there is good cause to do so. The bill would also apply to hearings on modifications of protective orders.
Methodology
During the COVID pandemic, the Office of Court Administration (OCA) began providing licenses to courts for remote proceedings upon request. Based on information provided by OCA, this analysis assumes that $336,000 in General Revenue would be needed each fiscal year to provide the technology and/or licenses for remote platforms to 3,200 judicial officers and their support staff to implement the provisions of the bill. Information provided by OCA indicates that approximately one-third of the courts that would be required to provide remote proceedings currently use an OCA license.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DDel, JPa
JMc, DDel, JPa