LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 18, 2023 TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB969 by Cook (Relating to local regulation to enforce child custody orders; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would allow a municipality or county to adopt an ordinance or order that imposes a civil penalty of not more than $500 for interfering with a child custody order. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DDel, BC, DPE
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 18, 2023
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB969 by Cook (Relating to local regulation to enforce child custody orders; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB969 by Cook (Relating to local regulation to enforce child custody orders; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Honorable Harold V. Dutton, Jr., Chair, House Committee on Juvenile Justice & Family Issues
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB969 by Cook (Relating to local regulation to enforce child custody orders; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
HB969 by Cook (Relating to local regulation to enforce child custody orders; authorizing a civil penalty.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would allow a municipality or county to adopt an ordinance or order that imposes a civil penalty of not more than $500 for interfering with a child custody order.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, DDel, BC, DPE
JMc, DDel, BC, DPE