Texas House Bill HJR28

Texas 2023 - 88th Regular

• Filed: 11/14/22

Caption

Proposing a constitutional amendment repealing the provision that subjects land designated for agricultural use to an additional tax when the land is diverted to a purpose other than agricultural use or sold.

Impact

The proposed amendment is set to take effect on January 1, 2024, and will apply to tax years starting from that date. If enacted, it is expected to impact agricultural landowners significantly by allowing them to transition their land to other uses without facing the additional tax penalty that currently exists. This change could lead to increased investment in land repurposing and stimulate economic activity in sectors outside of agriculture, broadening the opportunities for landowners.

Summary

HJR28 proposes a constitutional amendment that seeks to repeal an existing provision in the Texas Constitution. This provision subjects land designated for agricultural use to an additional tax when it is diverted to a non-agricultural purpose or sold. The aim of this bill is to alleviate the financial burdens on landowners who may wish to repurpose their agricultural land, thereby encouraging more flexible land use as economic circumstances change.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding HJR28 appears to be favorable among landowners and those advocating for property rights, as the repeal of the tax is seen as a positive move towards reducing unnecessary taxation. However, it may not be universally welcomed, as some conservationists and agricultural advocates could express concerns about the long-term impacts on agricultural land preservation and the potential for increased urbanization of rural areas.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential implications of repealing the tax on agricultural land preservation. Critics may argue that without the tax disincentive, there could be increased pressure to convert agricultural land to residential or commercial developments, which may undermine local food production and disrupt rural communities. The debate likely hinges on balancing property rights against the need for sustainable land use and agricultural integrity.