LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION May 4, 2023 TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB1603 by Hughes (Relating to the decision of a court of appeals not to accept certain interlocutory appeals.), As Passed 2nd House The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to a lack of interlocutory appeal data. The bill would provide that if a court of appeals does not accept an interlocutory appeal of an order that involves certain controlling questions of law on which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion where the appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the appeals court must state in its decision the specific reason for finding the appeal is not warranted. The bill authorizes the Texas Supreme Court to review an appeals court decision not to accept an interlocutory appeal de novo. The fiscal implications cannot be determined due to a lack of interlocutory appeal data. Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, interlocutory appeal data are not collected so an estimate of volume and related cost cannot be made. Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, CMA, JPa
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 88TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
May 4, 2023
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: SB1603 by Hughes (Relating to the decision of a court of appeals not to accept certain interlocutory appeals.), As Passed 2nd House
TO: Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: SB1603 by Hughes (Relating to the decision of a court of appeals not to accept certain interlocutory appeals.), As Passed 2nd House
Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
Honorable Dan Patrick, Lieutenant Governor, Senate
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
SB1603 by Hughes (Relating to the decision of a court of appeals not to accept certain interlocutory appeals.), As Passed 2nd House
SB1603 by Hughes (Relating to the decision of a court of appeals not to accept certain interlocutory appeals.), As Passed 2nd House
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to a lack of interlocutory appeal data.
The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to a lack of interlocutory appeal data.
The bill would provide that if a court of appeals does not accept an interlocutory appeal of an order that involves certain controlling questions of law on which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion where the appeal from the order may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation, the appeals court must state in its decision the specific reason for finding the appeal is not warranted. The bill authorizes the Texas Supreme Court to review an appeals court decision not to accept an interlocutory appeal de novo. The fiscal implications cannot be determined due to a lack of interlocutory appeal data. Based on information provided by the Office of Court Administration, interlocutory appeal data are not collected so an estimate of volume and related cost cannot be made.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td >
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, CMA, JPa
JMc, CMA, JPa