Texas 2023 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB2395 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/10/2023

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    88R14341 MLH-D
 By: West S.B. No. 2395


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the establishment of a task force to study disciplinary
 practices and policies in public schools.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  DEFINITIONS. In this Act:
 (1)  "Agency" means the Texas Education Agency.
 (2)  "Task force" means the task force established by
 this Act to study disciplinary practices and policies in public
 schools in this state.
 SECTION 2.  TASK FORCE TO STUDY SCHOOL DISCIPLINE. (a)  A
 task force is established under this Act to study, evaluate, and
 make recommendations for policies and practices relating to student
 discipline in public schools in this state.
 (b)  The task force shall consist of:
 (1)  the commissioner of education or the
 commissioner's designee;
 (2)  the following members appointed by the
 commissioner of education:
 (A)  two parents of students enrolled in a public
 school;
 (B)  two administrators of a public school;
 (C)  two educators certified under Subchapter B,
 Chapter 21, Education Code, and employed by a public school;
 (D)  a person who is either:
 (i)  a licensed clinical social worker, as
 defined by Section 505.002, Occupations Code; or
 (ii)  a school counselor certified under
 Subchapter B, Chapter 21, Education Code;
 (E)  a licensed specialist in school psychology,
 as defined by Section 501.002, Occupations Code;
 (F)  two people with expertise in school safety
 and school discipline in this state;
 (G)  a representative from the Texas School Safety
 Center; and
 (H)  a behavior analyst licensed under Chapter
 506, Occupations Code; and
 (3)  one additional member appointed by the task force
 to represent each additional organization, group, or agency that
 the task force determines would make necessary or helpful
 contributions.
 (c)  The commissioner of education or the commissioner's
 designee shall serve as the presiding officer of the task force.
 (d)  The task force shall meet at the times and places that
 the presiding officer determines appropriate. The task force may
 meet at an education research center, as defined by Section 1.005,
 Education Code.
 SECTION 3.  DUTIES OF THE TASK FORCE. (a)  The task force
 shall conduct a study to examine school discipline practices and
 policies in public schools throughout this state. The study shall
 include:
 (1)  an identification of the exclusionary and punitive
 disciplinary practices and procedures used in public schools,
 including:
 (A)  in-school suspension;
 (B)  out-of-school suspension;
 (C)  corporal punishment, as defined by Section
 37.0011, Education Code;
 (D)  restraint, as defined by Section 37.0021,
 Education Code;
 (E)  disciplinary alternative education programs
 under Subchapter A, Chapter 37, Education Code;
 (F)  juvenile justice alternative education
 programs under Section 37.011, Education Code;
 (G)  informal disciplinary actions that result in
 a student being removed from a classroom or instruction; and
 (H)  expulsion;
 (2)  an identification of the alternative disciplinary
 practices and procedures that are age-appropriate and
 research-based and focus on conflict resolution strategies to keep
 students engaged in the classroom that are used in public schools,
 including positive behavior programs under Section 37.0013,
 Education Code;
 (3)  an analysis of the practices and procedures
 identified under Subdivision (1) disaggregated based on student
 demographics including:
 (A)  race;
 (B)  gender;
 (C)  national origin;
 (D)  disability status;
 (E)  economic status;
 (F)  emergent bilingual status;
 (G)  whether the student is homeless; and
 (H)  whether the student is in the conservatorship
 of the state;
 (4)  an examination of the practices and policies
 identified under Subdivisions (1) and (2) to determine:
 (A)  how the use of disciplinary practices varies
 among independent school districts and open-enrollment charter
 schools, particularly among schools of similar size and student
 characteristics;
 (B)  the due process rights provided by schools to
 students and families in school disciplinary proceedings;
 (C)  the challenges students and families face in
 understanding and navigating school disciplinary proceedings;
 (D)  the impact removing a student from school or
 instruction has on the student and the broader school community;
 (E)  the protections afforded to students with
 diagnosed or undetected disabilities in disciplinary practices;
 (F)  the challenges students with diagnosed or
 undetected disabilities face when subjected to disciplinary
 practices under Subsection (a);
 (G)  the impacts mental and behavioral health
 challenges have on student behavior;
 (H)  the current law and relevant regulations
 permitting or requiring a school to account for a student's mental
 or behavioral health when making disciplinary decisions;
 (I)  how frequently independent school districts
 and open-enrollment charter schools implement alternative
 disciplinary practices and policies identified under Subdivision
 (2);
 (J)  the challenges independent school districts
 and open-enrollment charter schools face in implementing
 alternative disciplinary practices and policies identified under
 Subdivision (2);
 (K)  the systems in place to monitor and support
 school districts and open-enrollment charter schools in
 implementing alternative disciplinary practices and policies
 identified under Subdivision (2);
 (L)  the number of school districts that have
 implemented:
 (i)  a positive behavior program under
 Section 37.0013, Education Code; or
 (ii)  a program for graduated sanctions for
 certain school offenses under Section 37.144, Education Code;
 (M)  for each program listed under Paragraph (L)
 implemented by a school district:
 (i)  the method with which the program is
 implemented;
 (ii)  the challenges that made
 implementation difficult;
 (iii)  the systems in place to monitor and
 support the program;
 (iv)  whether and to what extent the
 implementation of the program has reduced the district's reliance
 on disciplinary practices and policies identified under
 Subdivision (1); and
 (v)  whether the programs have reduced the
 incidence of behavioral complaints by students and teachers in the
 district;
 (N)  the duties typically performed by a campus
 behavior coordinator;
 (O)  the strategies campus behavior coordinators
 use to reduce a reliance on disciplinary practices and policies
 identified under Subdivision (1);
 (P)  the resources and training to which educators
 have access regarding the disciplinary practices and policies
 identified under Subdivision (2);
 (Q)  the resources and training educators lack
 relating to disciplinary practices and policies identified under
 Subdivision (2);
 (R)  how the COVID-19 pandemic and remote learning
 impacted student behavior and school disciplinary resources;
 (S)  whether there are gaps in current data
 collection methods relating to the disciplinary practices and
 policies identified under Subdivisions (1) and (2), that if
 corrected, would aid assessment of disciplinary practices;
 (T)  the manner and frequency of use of informal
 disciplinary practices and policies in public schools, including
 unreported out-of-school suspensions, early parent pick-ups,
 silent lunches, exclusion from recess, time-out, as defined by
 Section 37.0021, Education Code, and removal by a teacher under
 Section 37.002, Education Code; and
 (U)  the frequency with which restraint, as
 defined by Section 37.0021, Education Code, is used on students as a
 disciplinary measure; and
 (5)  an examination of the manner in which current laws
 and practices interact with and affect student discipline in this
 state, including:
 (A)  whether Chapter 37, Education Code, provides
 sufficiently clear guidance on disciplinary practices identified
 under Subdivisions (1) and (2), specifically identifying
 redundancies or conflicts in the law that impact implementation;
 (B)  the current state of disciplinary
 alternative education programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 37,
 Education Code, and how those programs affect student outcomes;
 (C)  the current state of, and challenges to,
 oversight and accountability for disciplinary alternative
 education programs under Subchapter A, Chapter 37, Education Code;
 (D)  how to reduce the frequency and lengths of
 student placements in disciplinary alternative education programs
 under Subchapter A, Chapter 37, Education Code, in this state; and
 (E)  changes to law or policy that will better
 facilitate a student's transition back to the student's regular
 classroom from a disciplinary alternative education program under
 Subchapter A, Chapter 37, Education Code.
 (b)  Based on the results of the study conducted under this
 Act, the task force shall recommend changes to current law and
 regulations to improve student disciplinary practices and policies
 in public schools in this state.
 (c)  In completing the study and recommendations under this
 Act, the task force shall seek feedback from students, families,
 and educators and shall include that feedback in its report.
 (d)  The task force may use money appropriated or otherwise
 available for the purposes of completing the duties assigned to the
 task force under this Act.
 SECTION 4.  REPORT TO LEGISLATURE. Not later than December
 1, 2024, the task force shall prepare and submit to the legislature
 a written report that includes the findings from the study and the
 recommendations developed by the task force under this Act.
 SECTION 5.  EXPIRATION. The task force is abolished and this
 Act expires September 1, 2025.
 SECTION 6.  EFFECTIVE DATE.  This Act takes effect
 immediately if it receives a vote of two-thirds of all the members
 elected to each house, as provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas
 Constitution.  If this Act does not receive the vote necessary for
 immediate effect, this Act takes effect September 1, 2023.