Texas 2023 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB638 Introduced / Bill

Filed 01/27/2023

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    By: Springer S.B. No. 638


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the governance and decision-making of groundwater
 conservation districts in contested cases.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 Section 1. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.0015, subsection (b), is
 amended as follows:
 (b)  In order to provide for the conservation, preservation,
 protection, recharging, and prevention of waste of groundwater, and
 of groundwater reservoirs or their subdivisions, and to control
 subsidence caused by withdrawal of water from those groundwater
 reservoirs or their subdivisions, consistent with the objectives of
 Section 59, Article XVI, Texas Constitution, groundwater
 conservation districts may be created as provided by this chapter.
 Groundwater conservation districts created as provided by this
 chapter are the state's preferred method of groundwater management
 in order to protect property rights, balance the conservation and
 development of groundwater to meet the needs of this state, and use
 the best available science in the conservation and development of
 groundwater through rules and procedures developed, adopted, and
 promulgated by a district in accordance with the provisions of this
 chapter.
 Section 2. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.003 is added as
 follows:
 36.003. IMPORTANCE OF GROUNDWATER TO THE STATE'S
 ECONOMIC GROWTH. The legislature recognizes that timely decisions
 regarding production and transport of private groundwater are
 essential to the state's continued economic development. Delays in
 such decisions substantially increase uncertainty and expense, and
 thereby have a detrimental impact on the state's ability to
 competitively attract businesses. Accordingly, districts should
 ensure timely decisions in accordance with the procedures set forth
 in this chapter.
 Section 3. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.051 is amended by adding
 subsection (c-1) as follows:
 (c-1)  A director who has been recused from voting on more
 than one application for a permit or permit amendment or fails to
 attend meetings two consecutive meetings of the district board
 shall be disqualified from further service on the Board. The
 resulting vacant position shall be filled as provided by this
 chapter or as prescribed by the district's enabling legislation.
 Section 4. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.053 is amended as
 follows:
 (a)  A majority of the membership of the board constitutes a
 quorum for any meeting, and a concurrence of a majority of the
 entire membership of the board is sufficient for transacting any
 business of the district, except as provided by subsection (b).
 (b)  For purposes of reaching a final decision on a permit or
 permit amendment application, any board member who is recused from
 voting or fails to attend shall not count towards the quorum or
 majority requirements set forth in subsection (a).
 Section 5. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.409 is amended as
 follows:
 The presiding officer may continue a hearing from time to
 time and from place to place without providing notice under Section
 36.404; however, in no event shall such continuance exceed the time
 limits prescribed for issuance of a final decision as set forth in
 Section 36.4165. If the presiding officer continues a hearing
 without announcing at the hearing the time, date, and location of
 the continued hearing, the presiding officer must provide notice of
 the continued hearing by regular mail to the parties.
 Section 6. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.412 is amended as
 follows:
 (a)  An applicant in a contested or uncontested hearing on an
 application or a party to a contested hearing may administratively
 appeal a decision of the board on a permit or permit amendment
 application. Except for decisions by the board under Section
 36.4165, a party seeking to appeal a decision by the board must
 request by requesting written findings and conclusions not later
 than the 20th day after the date of the board's decision.
 (b)  On receipt of a timely written request required by
 subsection (a), the board shall make written findings and
 conclusions regarding a decision of the board on a permit or permit
 amendment application. The board shall provide certified copies of
 the findings and conclusions to the person who requested them, and
 to each designated party, not later than the 35th day after the date
 the board receives the request.
 (c)  A party to a contested hearing may request a rehearing
 not later than the 20th day after the date the board issues the
 findings and conclusions.
 (dc) A request for rehearing must be filed in the district
 office and must state the grounds for the request.  If the original
 hearing was a contested hearing, the party requesting a rehearing
 must provide copies of the request to all parties to the hearing.
 (ed) If the board grants a request for rehearing, the board
 shall schedule the rehearing not later than the 45th day after the
 date the request is granted.
 (fe) The failure of the board to grant or deny a request for
 rehearing before the 91st day after the date the request is
 submitted is a denial of the request.
 Section 7. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.413 is amended as
 follows:
 (a)  A decision by the board on a permit or permit amendment
 application is final:
 (1)  if a request for rehearing is not filed on time, on
 the expiration of the period for filing a request for rehearing; or
 (2)  if a request for rehearing is filed on time, on the
 date:
 (A)  the board denies the request for rehearing;
 or
 (B)  the board renders a written decision after
 rehearing, or
 (3)  as provided by section 36.4165(e).
 (b)  Except as provided by Subsection (c), an applicant or a
 party to a contested hearing may file a suit against the district
 under Section 36.251 to appeal a decision on a permit or permit
 amendment application not later than the 60th day after the date on
 which the decision becomes final.
 (c)  An applicant or a party to a contested hearing may not
 file suit against the district under Section 36.251 if a request for
 rehearing was not filed on time unless no such request is required
 under section 36.4165(e).
 Section 8. Texas Water Code Sec. 36.4165 is amended as
 follows:
 (a)  In a proceeding for a permit application or amendment in
 which a district has contracted with the State Office of
 Administrative Hearings for a contested case hearing, the board has
 the authority to make a final decision on consideration of a
 proposal for decision issued by an administrative law judge.
 (b)  A board may change a finding of fact or conclusion of law
 made by the administrative law judge, or may vacate or modify an
 order issued by the administrative judge, only if the board
 determines:
 (1)  that the administrative law judge did not properly
 apply or interpret applicable law, district rules, written policies
 provided under Section 36.416(e), or prior administrative
 decisions;
 (2)  that a prior administrative decision on which the
 administrative law judge relied is incorrect or should be changed;
 or
 (3)  that a technical error in a finding of fact should
 be changed.
 (c)  The final decision issued by the district under this
 section must be in writing and shall either adopt the proposed
 findings of fact and conclusions of law as proposed by the
 administrative law judge or include revised findings of fact and
 conclusions of law consistent with subsection (b). No request for
 findings of fact or conclusions of law from a party is required
 under this section.
 (d)  Notwithstanding any other timelines provided in this
 chapter, and unless otherwise agreed to by the applicant, a
 district must issue its final decision under this section no later
 than 180 days after receipt of the proposal for decision, including
 final disposition of all motions for rehearing.
 (e)  If the administrative law judge recommends granting one
 or more permits, and the district fails to issue its final decision
 as required by subsection (d) for any reason, the district shall be
 deemed to have adopted the recommendations of the administrative
 law judge as a final order.
 (f)  A decision under (e) is final and appealable immediately
 and not subject to a motion for rehearing.
 Section 9. STATUTORY INTERPRETATION. If there is a conflict
 between this Act and the enabling act of a groundwater conservation
 district or any other deadlines established by Chapter 36, this Act
 controls.
 Section 10. (a)  The changes in law made by this Act apply to
 any permit application that is filed with a district on or after the
 effective date of this Act and any permit application pending
 before a district for which a proposal for decision not yet been
 issued.
 (b)  Any proposal for decision that has been pending before a
 district for more than 180 days on the effective date and for which
 the administrative law judge recommends granting one or more
 permits, shall be deemed adopted as a final order subject to
 immediate appeal and not subject to a motion for rehearing.
 Section 11. This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
 Act takes effect September 1, 2023.