Texas 2023 88th Regular

Texas Senate Bill SB929 Introduced / Bill

Filed 02/15/2023

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    By: Parker S.B. No. 929


 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the notice and compensation a municipality must provide
 before revoking the right to use property for a use that was allowed
 before the adoption of or change to a zoning regulation or
 boundary.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  Section 211.006, Local Government Code, is
 amended by adding Subsection (a-1) to read as follows:
 (a-1)  In addition to any notice required by this section or
 Section 211.007, the governing body of a municipality or a zoning
 commission, as applicable, shall provide written notice of each
 public hearing regarding any proposed adoption of or change to a
 zoning regulation or boundary that could result in a current
 conforming use of a property becoming a nonconforming use if the
 regulation or boundary were to be adopted or changed. The notice
 must:
 (1) be mailed by United States mail to each owner of
 real or business personal property where the proposed nonconforming
 use is located as indicated by the most recently approved municipal
 tax roll and each occupant at that property not later than the 10th
 day before the hearing date;
 (2) contain the time and place of the hearing; and
 (3) include the following text in bold fourteen-point
 type or larger:
 "THE [MUNICIPALITY NAME] IS HOLDING A HEARING THAT
 WILL DETERMINE WHETHER YOU MAY LOSE THE RIGHT TO
 CONTINUE USING YOUR PROPERTY FOR ITS CURRENT USE.
 PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY."
 SECTION 2.  Subchapter A, Chapter 211, Local Government
 Code, is amended by adding Section 211.019 to read as follows:
 Sec. 211.019.  NONCONFORMING LAND USE. (a)  In this section,
 "market value" means the price the sale of the property would bring
 in an arms-length transaction when offered for sale by one who
 wishes, but is not obliged, to sell and when bought by one who is
 under no necessity of buying it.
 (b) Except as provided by this section, the operator of
 property with a nonconforming use as a result of the adoption of or
 change to a zoning regulation or boundary may continue to use the
 property in the same manner the property was used before the use
 became nonconforming.
 (c)  If a nonconforming use on a property described by
 Subsection (b) is required by a municipality to cease operation due
 to being a nonconforming use, the owner or the lessee of the
 property is entitled to receive either:
 (1)  a payment from the municipality composed of costs
 that are directly attributable to the municipal requirement of
 ceasing operation including demolition expenses, relocation
 expenses, termination of leases, and discharge of mortgages, and
 an amount equaling the diminution, if any, of the greater of, as
 determined by the municipality, the market value of the property on
 the day before:
 (A)  the notice under Section 211.006(a-1) was
 required to be sent to the property's owner of the adoption of or
 change to a zoning regulation or boundary that made the use
 nonconforming and the property's market value as a result of the
 use becoming nonconforming; or
 (B)  a person submits an application or request to
 the municipality to require or the municipality otherwise requires
 the nonconforming use to cease operation due to being a
 nonconforming use and the property's market value as a result of a
 municipal requirement that the use cease operation; or
 (2)  additional time to operate the nonconforming use
 until the property owner or lessee has recovered, through its
 business activities using generally accepted accounting
 principles, the amount determined under Subsection (c)(1).
 (d)  A municipal requirement to cease operation due to
 nonconformity under this section includes:
 (1)  an action of the governing body, board, commission,
 department, or official of the municipality; and
 (2)  a determination by the municipality that must be
 made before the nonconforming use is required to cease operation
 such as determining the use has an adverse effect.
 (e)  The municipality must notify each owner of real or
 business personal property, as indicated by the most recently
 approved municipal tax roll, with a nonconforming use subject to a
 municipal requirement to cease operation due to being a
 nonconforming use and each occupant at that property in writing of
 its requirement and the remedies described in Subsection (c) not
 later than the 10th day after the date the municipality imposes the
 requirement.
 (f)  The owner and any lessee of the real property must
 notify the municipality in writing of the remedy chosen under
 Subsection (c) not later than the 30th day after the date the
 municipality sent the notice required by Subsection (e). If the
 owner of real property and a lessee choose different remedies, the
 owner's choice of remedy controls. If there is more than one owner
 of the real property and they choose different remedies, the choice
 of remedy by owners who have a greater ownership interest in the
 property controls. If the property owner and lessee fail to provide
 timely notice, the municipality may choose the remedy.
 (g)  A person receiving payment under Subsection (c)(1) must
 cease operating the nonconforming use not later than the 10th day
 after the date of the payment.
 (h)  A person receiving additional time to operate the
 nonconforming use under Subsection (c)(2) must cease operating that
 use immediately on the expiration of the additional time.
 (i)  If both the owner and lessee of the property seek a
 payment from the municipality under Subsection (c)(1), the
 municipality shall apportion the payment between each based on the
 market value of their interests in the property. The municipality's
 apportionment may be appealed by either the owner or lessee in the
 same manner as other appeals allowed by this section.
 (j)  If the owner or lessee does not accept the
 municipality's determination under Subsection (c)(1) or (2),
 either person may appeal the determination to the board of
 adjustment of the municipality not later than the 20th day after the
 date the determination is made. At the hearing before the board of
 adjustment, the municipality has the burden of proof to establish
 the correctness of its determination.
 (k)  The municipality or a person aggrieved by the final
 decision of the board of adjustment may seek judicial review of the
 decision in the manner provided by Section 211.011 by filing suit
 not later than the 20th day after the date the final decision is
 made except that:
 (1) the municipality has the burden of proving by clear
 and convincing evidence that its determination was correct; and
 (2) in reviewing the municipality's decision, the
 court:
 (A) may not use a deferential standard in the
 municipality's favor; and
 (B) is not limited to determining whether a
 decision of the board is illegal.
 (l)  A person seeking additional time to operate under
 Subsection (c)(2) who appeals the decision of the municipality or
 board of adjustment may continue to use the property in the same
 manner as before the use became nonconforming pending the appeal
 unless an official of the body who made the decision certifies in
 writing to the entity with jurisdiction over the appeal facts
 supporting the official's opinion that continued nonconforming use
 of the property would cause imminent peril to life or property. In
 that case, continued nonconforming use of the property may be
 stayed only by a restraining order granted by the entity with
 jurisdiction over the appeal, after notice to the official, if due
 cause is shown.
 (m)  If following an appeal it is determined that the amount
 of compensation that a person is ultimately entitled to under this
 section is different from the amount initially received under
 Subsection (c)(1), the entity with jurisdiction over the appeal
 shall order additional compensation to the person or reimbursement
 to the municipality, as appropriate.
 (n)  If following an appeal it is determined that the amount
 of additional time to operate the nonconforming use that a person
 is ultimately entitled to under this section is different from the
 amount initially received under Subsection (c)(2), the entity with
 jurisdiction over the appeal shall order additional or less time to
 the person, as appropriate.
 (o)  An owner or lessee of the real property may waive the
 rights and remedies provided by this section by notifying the
 municipality in writing of the waiver.
 (p)  This section does not apply to a nonconforming use that
 has been intentionally abandoned for six months or more.
 (q)  A municipality's or board of adjustment's immunity from
 suit and liability is waived in an action brought by a property
 owner or lessee to enforce the rights and remedies under this
 section.
 SECTION 3.  (a) The changes in law made by this Act apply to
 property for which:
 (1)  on or after June 1, 2023, the governing body or
 zoning commission of a municipality considers a proposed adoption
 of or change to a zoning regulation or boundary that could result in
 a current conforming use of a property becoming a nonconforming
 use; or
 (2)  on or after February 1, 2023, the governing body or
 a board, commission, department, or official of a municipality
 requires, by ordinance or otherwise, or receives an application or
 request to require a nonconforming use to cease operation due to its
 nonconformity with the property's current zoning.
 (b)  Subsection (a)(2) of this section applies to a property
 even if the governing body or a board, commission, department, or
 official of the municipality is required to make a determination,
 such as determining the nonconforming use has an adverse effect,
 before the nonconforming use is required to cease operation.
 SECTION 4.  This Act takes effect immediately if it receives
 a vote of two-thirds of all the members elected to each house, as
 provided by Section 39, Article III, Texas Constitution. If this
 Act does not receive the vote necessary for immediate effect, this
 Act takes effect September 1, 2023.