Texas House Bill HB1431

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

• Filed: 11/20/24
• Out of House Committee: 5/7/25

Caption

Relating to certain prohibited acts with respect to cell-cultured protein for human consumption.

Impact

By prohibiting the sale of cell-cultured proteins, HB 1431 impacts the food industry, particularly innovation in agricultural practices and food production models. The law aims to regulate what foods can be sold to the public and enforces strict definitions around what constitutes meat and similar products. Critics argue that this may hinder investment and research in alternative protein sources that are increasingly seen as vital for sustainable food systems, particularly in combating climate change and meeting future food demands.

Summary

House Bill 1431 addresses the regulation of cell-cultured protein products intended for human consumption in Texas. The bill defines 'cell-cultured protein' as food produced by harvesting animal cells and artificially replicating them, establishing a clear legal framework around these new food technologies. The proposed legislation prohibits the sale and offering of cell-cultured protein, labeling it as unlawful until a specified expiration date in 2027. This indicates a cautious approach by the Texas Legislature towards emerging food technologies, prioritizing public health and safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB 1431 appears to be mixed. Supporters, particularly from traditional agricultural sectors, may view the bill as necessary for protecting consumers from untested food products and ensuring food safety. Conversely, opponents, including advocates for alternative proteins, may see this as an overreach that stifles innovation and prevents consumer choice. This has sparked a broader debate about the future of food production, market competition, and consumer rights in Texas.

Contention

Contention around HB 1431 primarily revolves around the definitions of protein sources and the implications of banning cell-cultured products. Advocates for cell-cultured proteins argue that they can provide sustainable and ethical alternatives to traditional meat, while opponents express concerns about the health implications and the need for thorough regulation. Moreover, the fact that this prohibition has a sunset clause set for 2027 suggests a legislative acknowledgment of the need for future review and potential adjustments based on evolving scientific knowledge and consumer preferences.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Health And Safety Code

• Chapter 431. Texas Food, Drug, And Cosmetic Act
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: 081
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section

• Chapter 433. Texas Meat And Poultry Inspection Act
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: 0415
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: 0415
  • Section: New Section