Texas 2025 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB206 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/07/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 3, 2025       TO: Honorable Drew Darby, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB206 by Craddick (relating to a limitation on a county s authority to require a cash bond before approving the construction of a pipeline.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted     No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.  Local Government ImpactNo significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td >   LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, RStu, BC, CWi

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 3, 2025



TO: Honorable Drew Darby, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB206 by Craddick (relating to a limitation on a county s authority to require a cash bond before approving the construction of a pipeline.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

TO: Honorable Drew Darby, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB206 by Craddick (relating to a limitation on a county s authority to require a cash bond before approving the construction of a pipeline.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Honorable Drew Darby, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources

Honorable Drew Darby, Chair, House Committee on Energy Resources

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB206 by Craddick (relating to a limitation on a county s authority to require a cash bond before approving the construction of a pipeline.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB206 by Craddick (relating to a limitation on a county s authority to require a cash bond before approving the construction of a pipeline.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

Local Government Impact

No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td >



LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, RStu, BC, CWi



JMc, RStu, BC, CWi