Texas 2025 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB2340 House Committee Report / Fiscal Note

Filed 04/17/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             April 10, 2025       TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2340 by Metcalf (relating to the qualifications, communications, and recordkeeping of a child custody evaluator and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would require after the filing of a notice, that certain records be made available on written request from an attorney for a party, a party who does not have an attorney, and any person appointed in the suit in which the evaluator conducted the evaluation. It is assumed any costs to the Office of Court Administration could be absorbed within existing resources. It is also assumed there would be no fiscal impact to the Department of Family and Protective Services.   Local Government ImpactNo fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KDw, ER, AN

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 10, 2025



TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB2340 by Metcalf (relating to the qualifications, communications, and recordkeeping of a child custody evaluator and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

TO: Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB2340 by Metcalf (relating to the qualifications, communications, and recordkeeping of a child custody evaluator and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted



Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Honorable Jeff Leach, Chair, House Committee on Judiciary & Civil Jurisprudence

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB2340 by Metcalf (relating to the qualifications, communications, and recordkeeping of a child custody evaluator and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

HB2340 by Metcalf (relating to the qualifications, communications, and recordkeeping of a child custody evaluator and the admissibility of a child custody evaluation under certain circumstances.), Committee Report 1st House, Substituted

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

The bill would require after the filing of a notice, that certain records be made available on written request from an attorney for a party, a party who does not have an attorney, and any person appointed in the suit in which the evaluator conducted the evaluation. It is assumed any costs to the Office of Court Administration could be absorbed within existing resources. It is also assumed there would be no fiscal impact to the Department of Family and Protective Services.

The bill would require after the filing of a notice, that certain records be made available on written request from an attorney for a party, a party who does not have an attorney, and any person appointed in the suit in which the evaluator conducted the evaluation.

It is assumed any costs to the Office of Court Administration could be absorbed within existing resources. It is also assumed there would be no fiscal impact to the Department of Family and Protective Services.

It is assumed any costs to the Office of Court Administration could be absorbed within existing resources. It is also assumed there would be no fiscal impact to the Department of Family and Protective Services.

Local Government Impact

No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of



212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KDw, ER, AN



JMc, KDw, ER, AN