Texas 2025 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB255 Introduced / Fiscal Note

Filed 11/20/2024

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             March 9, 2025       TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB255 by Guillen (Relating to the definitions of certain terms for purposes of the exemption from ad valorem taxation of farm products in the hands of the producer.), As Introduced     No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. Contingent on the passage of  HJR 31, the bill would expand the goods that are considered farm products from livestock, poultry and timber to also include aquatic goods produced in aquacultural operations and supplies used or produced in a farming operation.Expanding the definition of farm products in the hands of the producer and are therefore exempt from the property tax would reduce taxable property value and associated property tax revenue to school districts which would result in a cost to the state through the operation of the school finance formula. However, the cost is not expected to be significant.   Local Government ImpactContingent upon passage of a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to define farm products in the hands of the producer for the purposes of the property tax exemption, the bill would expand the list of items exempt from the property tax, which would reduce taxable value. However, the no-new-revenue and voter-approval tax rates as provided by Section 26.04, Tax Code would be higher as a consequence of the reduced taxable property value proposed by the bill. If cities, counties, and special districts did not adopt higher rates, local levies would be reduced. If those jurisdictions adopted higher tax rates, the initial revenue loss from the expanded exemption would be offset by increased tax levies from owners of non-exempt property and slightly reduced tax savings from owners of exempt property.   Source Agencies: b > td > 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, SD, BRI

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 9, 2025



TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB255 by Guillen (Relating to the definitions of certain terms for purposes of the exemption from ad valorem taxation of farm products in the hands of the producer.), As Introduced

TO: Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB255 by Guillen (Relating to the definitions of certain terms for purposes of the exemption from ad valorem taxation of farm products in the hands of the producer.), As Introduced



Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means

Honorable Morgan Meyer, Chair, House Committee on Ways & Means

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board

HB255 by Guillen (Relating to the definitions of certain terms for purposes of the exemption from ad valorem taxation of farm products in the hands of the producer.), As Introduced

HB255 by Guillen (Relating to the definitions of certain terms for purposes of the exemption from ad valorem taxation of farm products in the hands of the producer.), As Introduced

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.

Contingent on the passage of  HJR 31, the bill would expand the goods that are considered farm products from livestock, poultry and timber to also include aquatic goods produced in aquacultural operations and supplies used or produced in a farming operation.Expanding the definition of farm products in the hands of the producer and are therefore exempt from the property tax would reduce taxable property value and associated property tax revenue to school districts which would result in a cost to the state through the operation of the school finance formula. However, the cost is not expected to be significant.

Local Government Impact

Contingent upon passage of a constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to define farm products in the hands of the producer for the purposes of the property tax exemption, the bill would expand the list of items exempt from the property tax, which would reduce taxable value. However, the no-new-revenue and voter-approval tax rates as provided by Section 26.04, Tax Code would be higher as a consequence of the reduced taxable property value proposed by the bill. If cities, counties, and special districts did not adopt higher rates, local levies would be reduced. If those jurisdictions adopted higher tax rates, the initial revenue loss from the expanded exemption would be offset by increased tax levies from owners of non-exempt property and slightly reduced tax savings from owners of exempt property.

Source Agencies: b > td > 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts



304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, KK, SD, BRI



JMc, KK, SD, BRI