LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 12, 2025 TO: Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB4302 by Metcalf (Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.), As Introduced Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB4302, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,094,540) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill. General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Net Positive/(Negative) Impact toGeneral Revenue Related Funds2026($1,047,270)2027($1,047,270)2028($1,047,270)2029($1,047,270)2030($1,047,270)All Funds, Five-Year Impact: Fiscal Year Probable Savings/(Cost) fromGeneral Revenue Fund1 Change in Number of State Employees from FY 20252026($1,047,270)7.02027($1,047,270)7.02028($1,047,270)7.02029($1,047,270)7.02030($1,047,270)7.0 Fiscal AnalysisThe bill would amend the Utilities Code to require the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to adopt rules that allow electric utilities to request a separate charge in their rates to ensure a more timely recovery of vegetation management costs. An affected customer may request a hearing on a utility's request to recover vegetation management costs, however a hearing is not required unless there is a total bill increase of 10 percent or more. PUC shall establish by rule the timing of the reconciliation period for each electric utility subject to this section.
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 12, 2025
TO: Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB4302 by Metcalf (Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB4302 by Metcalf (Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.), As Introduced
Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
Honorable Ken King, Chair, House Committee on State Affairs
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB4302 by Metcalf (Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.), As Introduced
HB4302 by Metcalf (Relating to the recovery of vegetation management costs by electric utilities.), As Introduced
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB4302, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,094,540) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
Estimated Two-year Net Impact to General Revenue Related Funds for HB4302, As Introduced: a negative impact of ($2,094,540) through the biennium ending August 31, 2027. The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
The bill would make no appropriation but could provide the legal basis for an appropriation of funds to implement the provisions of the bill.
General Revenue-Related Funds, Five- Year Impact:
2026 ($1,047,270)
2027 ($1,047,270)
2028 ($1,047,270)
2029 ($1,047,270)
2030 ($1,047,270)
All Funds, Five-Year Impact:
2026 ($1,047,270) 7.0
2027 ($1,047,270) 7.0
2028 ($1,047,270) 7.0
2029 ($1,047,270) 7.0
2030 ($1,047,270) 7.0
Fiscal Analysis
The bill would amend the Utilities Code to require the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to adopt rules that allow electric utilities to request a separate charge in their rates to ensure a more timely recovery of vegetation management costs. An affected customer may request a hearing on a utility's request to recover vegetation management costs, however a hearing is not required unless there is a total bill increase of 10 percent or more. PUC shall establish by rule the timing of the reconciliation period for each electric utility subject to this section.
Methodology
Based on the analysis of the PUC, this estimate assumes the agency would process an additional 10 to 20 contested cases per year. This additional workload would require 7.0 additional full time equivalents (FTE) positions. Three Attorney III-IV ($115,500 per year with estimated benefits of $38,825), two Engineer III-V ($115,500 per year with estimated benefits of $38,825), and two Financial Examiners IV-V ($105,000 per year with estimated benefits of $29,841) would be needed for periodic rate reviews, and reconciliation and protest case proceedings. Other associated costs include $9,773 per year for payroll contributions, travel and other operating expenses.Based on the analysis of the State Office of Administrative Hearings (SOAH), the agency is unable to estimate the fiscal impact of the bill due to the unknown number of potential contested cased. However, SOAH estimates the anticipated additional cost per each contested case proceeded would be $44,700.
Technology
PUC anticipates information technology expenditures of $17,063 per year.
Local Government Impact
No significant fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 360 State Office of Administrative Hearings, 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
360 State Office of Administrative Hearings, 473 Public Utility Commission of Texas
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, WP, GDZ, JBel
JMc, WP, GDZ, JBel