Texas House Bill HB4588

Texas 2025 - 89th Regular

• Filed: 3/12/25
• Out of House Committee: 4/22/25
• Voted on by House: 4/30/25

Caption

Relating to the regulation of aquatic vegetation management by the Parks and Wildlife Department; providing a civil penalty; creating a criminal offense.

Impact

The implementation of HB 4588 will have direct implications for existing state laws regarding environmental protection and resource management. The bill introduces civil penalties for violations ranging from $100 to $10,000 per infraction and establishes a criminal offense classified as a Class C misdemeanor for non-compliance. By outlining these regulations and penalties, the bill seeks to enforce responsible practices and ensure that those who manage aquatic vegetation follow standardized methods that safeguard state waters.

Summary

House Bill 4588 is focused on the management of aquatic vegetation in Texas, specifically regulating how individuals and entities can control aquatic plant life in public bodies of water. The bill stipulates that any action taken to manage aquatic vegetation must align with established good practices, including the state aquatic vegetation management plan and applicable local plans. This aims to ensure that aquatic ecosystems are preserved while managing invasive species effectively. The intent is to provide a clear framework for maintaining ecological balance in state waters.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 4588 appears to be generally favorable among environmental advocacy groups and governmental bodies tasked with natural resource management. Advocates for the bill argue that it provides necessary oversight and accountability regarding aquatic plant management. However, there may be some contention among private property owners and recreational users of water bodies who could be affected by stringent regulations limiting their ability to manage vegetation on their properties.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for increased regulatory oversight and the associated costs for compliance imposed on individuals and businesses involved in aquatic management. Critics may argue that, while the intention behind the bill is to protect the environment, it could create barriers for those needing to manage their waterfront properties effectively. Additionally, discussions on how these regulations will be enforced and the balance between ecological protection and individual rights may also contribute to the debate surrounding the bill.

Texas Constitutional Statutes Affected

Parks And Wildlife Code

• Chapter 11. Parks And Wildlife Department
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section
  • Section: New Section