Texas 2025 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB4997 Introduced / Bill

Filed 03/13/2025

Download
.pdf .doc .html
                    89R15342 MM-D
 By: Reynolds H.B. No. 4997




 A BILL TO BE ENTITLED
 AN ACT
 relating to the tenure and employment of faculty members at certain
 public institutions of higher education.
 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
 SECTION 1.  The heading to Section 51.942, Education Code,
 is amended to read as follows:
 Sec. 51.942.  PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY
 [TENURE].
 SECTION 2.  Section 51.942(a)(1), Education Code, is amended
 to read as follows:
 (1)  "Governing board" has [and "university system"
 have] the meaning [meanings] assigned by Section 61.003.
 SECTION 3.  Section 51.942, Education Code, is amended by
 amending Subsections (b), (c), (c-1), (c-2), and (c-3) and adding
 Subsection (d) to read as follows:
 (b)  [Only an institution of higher education's governing
 board, on the recommendation of the institution's chief executive
 officer and the university system's chancellor, if applicable, may
 grant tenure.
 [(c)  The granting of tenure may not be construed to create a
 property interest in any attribute of a faculty position beyond a
 faculty member's continuing employment, including his or her
 regular annual salary and any privileges incident to his or her
 status as a tenured professor.
 [(c-1)]  Each governing board of an institution of higher
 education shall adopt policies and procedures providing [regarding
 tenure.  The policies and procedures must:
 [(1)  address the granting of tenure;
 [(2)  allow for the dismissal of a tenured faculty
 member at any time after providing the faculty member with
 appropriate due process, on a determination that:
 [(A)  the faculty member has:
 [(i)  exhibited professional incompetence;
 [(ii)  continually or repeatedly failed to
 perform duties or meet professional responsibilities of the faculty
 member's position;
 [(iii)  failed to successfully complete any
 post-tenure review professional development program;
 [(iv)  engaged in conduct involving moral
 turpitude that adversely affects the institution or the faculty
 member's performance of duties or meeting of responsibilities;
 [(v)  violated laws or university system or
 institution policies substantially related to the performance of
 the faculty member's duties;
 [(vi)  been convicted of a crime affecting
 the fitness of the faculty member to engage in teaching, research,
 service, outreach, or administration;
 [(vii)  engaged in unprofessional conduct
 that adversely affects the institution or the faculty member's
 performance of duties or meeting of responsibilities; or
 [(viii)  falsified the faculty member's
 academic credentials;
 [(B)  there is actual financial exigency or the
 phasing out of the institution's programs requiring elimination of
 the faculty member's position; or
 [(C)  there is other good cause as defined in the
 institution's policies; and
 [(3)  provide] for a periodic performance evaluation
 process for all tenured faculty at the institution.
 [(c-2)]  The governing board may design its policies and
 procedures to fit the institution's particular educational
 mission, traditions, resources, and circumstances relevant to the
 institution's character, role, and scope, in addition to other
 relevant factors determined by the governing board in the policies
 and procedures adopted under this section.  The governing board
 shall seek advice and comment from the institution's faculty before
 adopting any policies and procedures under this section.  The
 advice and comment from the faculty on the performance evaluation
 of tenured faculty shall be given the utmost consideration by the
 governing board.
 (c) [(c-3)]  In addition to any other provisions adopted by
 the governing board, the policies and procedures adopted by the
 governing board under Subsection (b) [(c-1)] must include
 provisions providing that:
 (1)  each tenured faculty member at the institution be
 subject to a comprehensive performance evaluation process
 conducted no more often than once every year, but no less often than
 once every six years, after the date the faculty member was granted
 tenure or received an academic promotion at the institution;
 (2)  the comprehensive performance evaluation be based
 on the professional responsibilities of the faculty member, in
 teaching, research, service, patient care, and administration, and
 include peer review of the faculty member;
 (3)  the comprehensive performance evaluation process
 be directed toward the professional development of the faculty
 member;
 (4)  the comprehensive performance evaluation process
 incorporate commonly recognized academic due process rights,
 including notice of the manner and scope of the comprehensive
 performance evaluation, the opportunity to provide documentation
 during the comprehensive performance evaluation process, and,
 before a faculty member may be subject to disciplinary action on the
 basis of a comprehensive performance evaluation conducted under
 this subsection, notice of specific charges and an opportunity for
 hearing on those charges; and
 (5)  a faculty member be subject to revocation of
 tenure or other appropriate disciplinary action if, during the
 comprehensive performance evaluation, incompetency, neglect of
 duty, or other good cause is determined to be present [; and
 [(6)  for a faculty member who receives an
 unsatisfactory rating in any area of any evaluation conducted under
 this section, the evaluation process provide for a short-term
 development plan that includes performance benchmarks for
 returning to satisfactory performance].
 (d)  A faculty member subject to termination on the basis of
 an evaluation conducted under this section must be given the
 opportunity for referral of the matter to a nonbinding alternative
 dispute resolution process as described in Chapter 154, Civil
 Practice and Remedies Code. If both parties agree, another type of
 alternative dispute resolution method may be elected. The governing
 board must give specific reasons in writing for any decision to
 terminate a faculty member on the basis of an evaluation conducted
 under this section.
 SECTION 4.  The following provisions of the Education Code
 are repealed:
 (1)  Section 51.942(a)(4); and
 (2)  Section 51.942(c-4).
 SECTION 5.  This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.