LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD Austin, Texas FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION April 20, 2025 TO: Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB5394 by Rose (Relating to prohibiting child-placing agencies from imposing certain requirements on relative and designated caregivers.), As Introduced No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated. The bill would prohibit a child placing agency from subjecting a relative or designated caregiver to any requirements not provided by law or department or Health and Human Services Commission rule. It is assumed that any costs to the Department of Family and Protective Services could be absorbed within existing resources. Local Government ImpactNo fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated. Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, ER, AN
LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
April 20, 2025
TO: Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board IN RE: HB5394 by Rose (Relating to prohibiting child-placing agencies from imposing certain requirements on relative and designated caregivers.), As Introduced
TO: Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB5394 by Rose (Relating to prohibiting child-placing agencies from imposing certain requirements on relative and designated caregivers.), As Introduced
Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Honorable Lacey Hull, Chair, House Committee on Human Services
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
HB5394 by Rose (Relating to prohibiting child-placing agencies from imposing certain requirements on relative and designated caregivers.), As Introduced
HB5394 by Rose (Relating to prohibiting child-placing agencies from imposing certain requirements on relative and designated caregivers.), As Introduced
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
No significant fiscal implication to the State is anticipated.
The bill would prohibit a child placing agency from subjecting a relative or designated caregiver to any requirements not provided by law or department or Health and Human Services Commission rule. It is assumed that any costs to the Department of Family and Protective Services could be absorbed within existing resources.
It is assumed that any costs to the Department of Family and Protective Services could be absorbed within existing resources.
Local Government Impact
No fiscal implication to units of local government is anticipated.
Source Agencies: b > td > 530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
530 Family and Protective Services, Department of
LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, NPe, ER, AN
JMc, NPe, ER, AN