Texas 2025 89th Regular

Texas House Bill HB674 Fiscal Note / Fiscal Note

Filed 03/11/2025

                    LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD     Austin, Texas       FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION             March 11, 2025       TO: Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB674 by Spiller (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses committed in the course of or for the purpose of avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading an arrest or detention; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced     Increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon state correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct that would be subject to an increased criminal penalty under the provisions of the bill. The bill would increase the penalty in certain circumstances for an offense of assault, burglary, burglary of vehicles, or criminal trespass to a third degree felony when it is committed in the course of or for the purpose of intentionally avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints. The bill would increase the penalty for certain conduct constituting the offense of smuggling of persons to a third degree felony when committed in the course of or for the purpose of intentionally avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading arrest.The fiscal impact and any impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources cannot be determined due to a lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct that would be subject to an increased criminal penalty under the provisions of the bill.  Local Government ImpactWhile the fiscal impact cannot be determined, increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement.  Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts  LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, MGol, AMr, DGI

LEGISLATIVE BUDGET BOARD
Austin, Texas
FISCAL NOTE, 89TH LEGISLATIVE REGULAR SESSION
March 11, 2025

 

 

  TO: Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs     FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board      IN RE: HB674 by Spiller (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses committed in the course of or for the purpose of avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading an arrest or detention; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced   

TO: Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs
FROM: Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board
IN RE: HB674 by Spiller (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses committed in the course of or for the purpose of avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading an arrest or detention; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced

 Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

 Honorable Cole Hefner, Chair, House Committee on Homeland Security, Public Safety & Veterans' Affairs

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 Jerry McGinty, Director, Legislative Budget Board 

 HB674 by Spiller (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses committed in the course of or for the purpose of avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading an arrest or detention; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced 

 HB674 by Spiller (Relating to the prosecution and punishment of certain criminal offenses committed in the course of or for the purpose of avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading an arrest or detention; increasing criminal penalties.), As Introduced 



Increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon state correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct that would be subject to an increased criminal penalty under the provisions of the bill.

Increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon state correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement. The fiscal implications of the bill cannot be determined due to the lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct that would be subject to an increased criminal penalty under the provisions of the bill.

The bill would increase the penalty in certain circumstances for an offense of assault, burglary, burglary of vehicles, or criminal trespass to a third degree felony when it is committed in the course of or for the purpose of intentionally avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints. The bill would increase the penalty for certain conduct constituting the offense of smuggling of persons to a third degree felony when committed in the course of or for the purpose of intentionally avoiding certain law enforcement checkpoints or evading arrest.The fiscal impact and any impact on state correctional populations or on the demand for state correctional resources cannot be determined due to a lack of data to estimate the prevalence of conduct that would be subject to an increased criminal penalty under the provisions of the bill.

 Local Government Impact

While the fiscal impact cannot be determined, increasing the penalty for an existing offense may result in additional demands upon local correctional resources due to a possible increase in the number of individuals placed under supervision in the community or sentenced to a term of confinement.

Source Agencies: b > td > 212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

212 Office of Court Administration, Texas Judicial Council, 304 Comptroller of Public Accounts

LBB Staff: b > td > JMc, MGol, AMr, DGI

JMc, MGol, AMr, DGI