Relating to the notice and petition for the creation of a municipal utility district in certain counties.
Impact
The bill could have significant implications for local governance and the management of utilities within Texas counties. By requiring prior notification to county officials, SB102 aims to enhance transparency and involvement in the decision-making process pertaining to municipal utility districts. This could lead to greater consideration of local needs and concerns before the establishment of these districts, which often preside over essential utility services such as water and sanitation.
Summary
SB102 proposes amendments to the Water Code concerning the process for creating municipal utility districts in Texas. The bill establishes a requirement for municipalities to notify the commissioners court of the relevant counties at least 30 days before a petition is submitted to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) for the creation of a proposed district. This pre-petition notice is intended to ensure that counties are informed and can take part in the process, giving them the opportunity to respond and express opinions regarding the proposed district.
Conclusion
The enactment of SB102 would refine the existing procedures in the Water Code, directly affecting how municipal utility districts can be established in Texas. If passed, this bill could serve to balance the need for efficient utility expansion with the necessary oversight from county officials, fostering a collaborative approach to local utility governance.
Contention
Notably, the bill could be contested in terms of additional regulatory obligations imposed on those filing for district creation. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens local oversight and accountability, while opponents might view it as an unnecessary complication that could delay vital utility projects that require prompt action. Additionally, there could be concerns from developers and property owners regarding the constraints placed on establishing new utility districts, potentially affecting property development timelines.
Identical
Relating to the filing with the county clerk of certain counties of a draft of a petition requesting the creation of a municipal utility district.
Relating to the inclusion of a water conservation plan in a petition filed with the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality requesting the creation of a municipal utility district.
Relating to the creation of the Harris-Waller Counties Municipal Utility District No. 8; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to the creation of the Harris-Waller Counties Municipal Utility District No. 9; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to the creation of the Austin County Municipal Utility District No. 3; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to the creation of the Guadalupe County Municipal Utility District No. 8; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.
Relating to the Mustang Ridge Municipal Utility District, the Wildwood Municipal Utility District, the Creedmoor Municipal Utility District, and the Williamson County Municipal Utility District No. 40; granting limited powers of eminent domain.
Relating to the creation of the Guadalupe County Municipal Utility District No. 8; granting a limited power of eminent domain; providing authority to issue bonds; providing authority to impose assessments, fees, and taxes.