Us Congress House Bill HB699

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/23/25
• Refer: 1/23/25

Caption

No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund ActThis bill prohibits the use of funds to provide contributions directly or indirectly to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). The UNFPA is the United Nations sexual and reproductive health agency.

Impact

Should HB 699 be enacted into law, it would effectively eliminate any government funding to the UNFPA, an organization often criticized by conservative lawmakers for its alleged involvement in promoting abortion rights internationally. The bill would amend existing statutes to specifically prohibit the allocation of U.S. funds for these purposes, thereby tightening the control over how public money is spent on international aid. The move could greatly affect U.S. involvement in global health initiatives and reproductive rights advocacy, which may face significant setbacks without funding from one of the largest donor nations.

Summary

House Bill 699, titled the 'No Taxpayer Funding for the U.N. Population Fund Act', aims to prohibit any financial contributions from the United States to the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA). Introduced in January 2025 by a group of Republican legislators, the bill reflects a long-standing controversy regarding U.S. support for international organizations that provide reproductive health services. The initiative seeks to ensure that U.S. taxpayer funds are not used to support programs that are connected to abortion services or population control policies, issues that remain contentious in American politics.

Contention

The potential passage of HB 699 has sparked debates among lawmakers and advocacy groups. Supporters argue that taxpayer money should not fund organizations that may condone or promote policies contrary to U.S. values regarding life and family. They view the bill as a necessary step in maintaining ethical standards in foreign aid and protecting taxpayers from indirectly funding practices they oppose. Conversely, opponents assert that this bill undermines critical global health services that assist millions, particularly in developing countries, emphasizing that such measures could lead to increased maternal and infant mortality rates. They express concerns that by pulling funding, the U.S. would be withdrawing from its leadership role in promoting health and rights on an international scale.

Congress_id

119-HR-699

Policy_area

International Affairs

Introduced_date

2025-01-23