Us Congress House Bill HJR104

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/10/25
• Refer: 7/10/25
• Engrossed: 9/4/25

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment".

Impact

If enacted, HJR104 would prevent the implementation of the specific rule concerning resource management in the Miles City Field Office area. This decision could have far-reaching implications for how federal land is managed in that region, potentially altering land use, conservation efforts, and local governmental authority over resource allocation. The disapproval indicates a preference for congressional oversight in mandates that dictate land use policy, which could affect various stakeholders including local governments, environmental groups, and the agricultural sector.

Summary

HJR104 is a joint resolution that provides for congressional disapproval of a rule issued by the Bureau of Land Management regarding the Miles City Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan Amendment. The resolution aims to nullify the rule, which was submitted in November 2024. This action highlights the legislative branch's authority under the Congressional Review Act to disapprove agency regulations that they find objectionable. The passage of this resolution reflects a significant move by Congress to intervene in federal land management practices that have been previously established by the Bureau.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around HJR104 appears to be divided among lawmakers and interest groups. Supporters argue that it reinforces congressional powers and ensures that federal policies align with local needs and priorities. They view it as a necessary check on bureaucratic overreach. Conversely, opponents might see this as an adverse move that could disrupt established environmental protections and contribute to conflict between state and federal land management objectives.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HJR104 revolve around local versus federal authority in resource management. Critics of the resolution may argue that it undermines comprehensive planning efforts witnessed prior to the resolution, leading to potential gaps in land management strategies. Furthermore, discussions surrounding the measure point to broader national debates regarding environmental regulations and the role of federal agencies in overseeing natural resources and public lands.