Us Congress House Bill HJR105

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 7/10/25
• Refer: 7/10/25
• Engrossed: 9/4/25

Caption

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

Impact

Should HJR105 be enacted, it would nullify the BLM's approved resource management plan, effectively resetting or delaying the implementation of any proposed regulations associated with it. This could impact land use practices, environmental policies, and resource extraction strategies within North Dakota. The measure highlights the ongoing tension between state management of land resources and federal oversight, showing a significant potential shift in how land management is conducted in the state and allowing for more state influence over local land use policies.

Summary

HJR105 is a joint resolution that seeks congressional disapproval under Chapter 8 of Title 5, United States Code, concerning a rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This rule is related to the 'North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan.' The resolution underscores Congress's authority to reject regulations that they perceive to be unnecessary or detrimental, emphasizing a system of checks and balances within federal regulatory processes. The passed resolution signifies a clear stance by Congress against the specific management plan put forth by the BLM for North Dakota's resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HJR105 appears to be a mix of support and opposition, largely reflecting ideological divides on governance and environmental policy. Supporters argue that congressional disapproval ensures necessary oversight on federal regulations, creating a platform for local governance to better reflect the interests and needs of its constituents. Conversely, critics may view the resolution as undermining the work done by the BLM, which may have been based on detailed assessments and planning, and are concerned about potential negative impacts on resource management practices.

Contention

Notable points of contention related to HJR105 revolve around the balance of power between state and federal authorities in managing land resources. Supporters of the joint resolution maintain that local conditions and input are essential in crafting effective management plans, while opponents worry that disapproval might lead to lax environmental standards and insufficient resource protection. The vote count of 214 yeas to 211 nays indicates the polarizing nature of this issue, capturing the complex interplay of environmental, economic, and local versus federal interests at the heart of the debate.