Us Congress Senate Bill SJR28

Us Congress 2025-2026 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/27/25
• Refer: 2/27/25
• Engrossed: 3/10/25
• Enrolled: 5/5/25
• Passed: 5/9/25
• Chaptered: 5/9/25

Caption

A joint resolution disapproving the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to "Defining Larger Participants of a Market for General-Use Digital Consumer Payment Applications".

Impact

By disapproving the CFPB's regulation, SJR28 could significantly alter the oversight of digital payment applications and the entities operating within that space. Supporters of the joint resolution argue that removing this regulation could alleviate burdens on businesses that do not fall under the defined larger participant category, allowing smaller companies to operate without the same level of scrutiny. Conversely, opponents warn that this move may weaken consumer protections and oversight in a rapidly evolving financial technology sector, potentially exposing consumers to greater risks.

Summary

SJR28 is a joint resolution introduced in the United States Congress that aims to disapprove a rule issued by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB). This rule pertains to the definition of larger participants within the market of general-use digital consumer payment applications. Specifically, it categorizes nonbank entities with at least 50 million annual transactions as 'larger participants' and subjects them to supervisory authority under the CFPB. The resolution seeks to nullify this rule, effectively rendering it without force or effect, thereby impacting the regulatory landscape of digital consumer payment systems.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR28 is mixed among various stakeholders. Proponents primarily from the business community and some political factions view the disapproval of the CFPB's rule as a necessary step towards reducing regulatory overreach and fostering innovation in the financial technology arena. However, consumer advocacy groups and some lawmakers express concern that this action may lead to diminished oversight, thereby compromising consumer rights and protections in digital transactions.

Contention

The key points of contention include the balance between fostering innovation within digital financial services against ensuring adequate consumer protection. Advocates for SJR28 emphasize the need for an unencumbered marketplace that encourages growth, while critics highlight the potential risks associated with a lack of regulatory oversight for larger market participants. The discussions surrounding the bill underscore a broader debate regarding the role of government in regulating emerging technologies and safeguarding consumer interests.