Utah 2022 Regular Session

Utah Senate Bill SB0217

Introduced
2/16/22  
Refer
2/17/22  
Report Pass
2/23/22  
Engrossed
2/25/22  
Refer
2/28/22  
Report Pass
3/1/22  
Enrolled
3/11/22  

Caption

Protective Order Revisions

Impact

The amendments proposed by SB0217 modify existing statutes concerning protective orders, particularly clarifying how and where individuals can file for such orders. The bill addresses a practical concern for victims of stalking or domestic violence, providing them more options and potentially faster access to legal protections. By allowing injunctions to be filed in any county of temporary domicile, the legislation acknowledges the realities of domestic migration and aim to enhance protections for vulnerable individuals.

Summary

SB0217, known as the Protective Order Revisions bill, aims to clarify the jurisdictional aspects of protective orders and civil stalking injunctions in the state of Utah. Specifically, the bill allows these orders to be filed in the county where a party is temporarily domiciled, thereby expanding access to protective measures for victims who may not reside permanently in the county where the order is sought. This change is designed to ensure that individuals facing threats or harassment can seek immediate legal protection without being hindered by jurisdictional boundaries.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB0217 appears to be generally positive, with stakeholders recognizing the importance of improving the legal framework for protective orders. Supporters of the bill, including advocates for domestic violence victims, believe these revisions could lead to better outcomes for those in need of protection. However, there may be concerns regarding the implementation and consistency of how courts will manage these new filings, highlighting the need for adequate training and resources for the judiciary.

Contention

While the bill has generated support for its intent, there may be contention regarding the enforcement of these protective orders across different jurisdictions. Critics could argue that allowing filings in multiple counties could complicate the tracking and enforcement of injunctions, which might lead to confusion or gaps in protection for individuals. Ensuring that all parties involved, including law enforcement and court systems, are effectively integrated into this new structure will be critical to the bill's success.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

UT SB0191

Protective Orders Amendments

UT HB0324

Workplace Violence Protective Orders Amendments

UT SB0085

Protective Order and Stalking Injunction Expungement

UT HB0287

Stalking Amendments

UT HB0175

Protection of Animals Amendments

UT SB0293

Expungement Revisions

UT HB0159

Protection Order Amendments

UT SB957

Protective orders; military protective orders.

UT HB1882

Protective orders; military protective orders.

UT SB751

Protective orders; military protective orders.

Similar Bills

CA SB775

Felony murder: resentencing.

CA SB1129

Felony murder: resentencing: peace officer victims.

CA AB262

Human trafficking: vacatur relief for victims.

CA AB2869

Human trafficking: vacatur relief for victims: fines.

HI SB169

Relating To Redress For Wrongful Conviction And Imprisonment.

CA AB2169

Criminal procedure.

DE SB169

An Act To Amend Title 10 Of The Delaware Code Relating To Wrongful Conviction Compensation And Services.

CA SB94

Recall and resentencing: special circumstances.