Utah Senate Bill SJR002

Utah 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/22
• Refer: 1/20/22
• Report Pass: 1/21/22
• Engrossed: 1/26/22
• Refer: 1/28/22
• Report Pass: 2/2/22
• Enrolled: 3/11/22

Caption

Joint Resolution Urging Congress to Propose the Keep Nine Amendment to the United States Constitution

Impact

If adopted, the Keep Nine Amendment would effectively prevent any future alterations to the number of justices on the Supreme Court by Congress or the President, thus solidifying the current judicial structure. Proponents of the resolution argue that maintaining nine justices is essential for the stability and independence of the judiciary, critical in upholding the rule of law and protecting individual rights from political influences.

Summary

SJR002 is a joint resolution from the state of Utah urging the United States Congress to propose the 'Keep Nine Amendment' to the U.S. Constitution. This proposed amendment aims to establish a constitutional requirement that the Supreme Court of the United States maintain its composition at nine justices, a practice that has been in place for over 150 years. The resolution emphasizes the importance of an independent Supreme Court as a critical component of checks and balances in protecting constitutional rights.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SJR002 appears to be predominantly supportive among its sponsors and Republican lawmakers, who view it as a necessary safeguard against potential changes in the Supreme Court's composition that could threaten its independence. However, there may be opposition from those who view the proposal as politically motivated, particularly in light of recent discussions about expanding the Supreme Court to achieve certain political ends.

Contention

The main point of contention revolves around the implications of such a constitutional amendment. Critics might argue that it limits the flexibility necessary for adapting to changing political and judicial landscapes. The debate about the composition of the Supreme Court is a contentious issue, and some may see this resolution as an attempt to entrench a specific political ideology within the court system. As such, discussions around SJR002 could highlight broader tensions regarding judicial reform and the balance of power among branches of government.