Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
1
Administrative Procedures Act Amendments
2025 GENERAL SESSION
STATE OF UTAH
Chief Sponsor: Karianne Lisonbee
Senate Sponsor: Todd Weiler
2
3
LONG TITLE
4
General Description:
5
This bill modifies provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act.
6
Highlighted Provisions:
7
This bill:
8
▸ provides cross references;
9
▸ describes when an order or decree constitutes a final agency action; and
10
▸ makes technical changes.
11
Money Appropriated in this Bill:
12
None
13
Other Special Clauses:
14
None
15
Utah Code Sections Affected:
16
AMENDS:
17
19-1-301.5, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2018, Chapter 281
18
59-1-205, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2003, Chapter 80
19
63G-4-302, as renumbered and amended by Laws of Utah 2008, Chapter 382
20
63G-4-401, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 433
21
63G-4-403, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2024, Chapter 158
22
78A-3-102, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2009, Chapter 344
23
78A-4-103, as last amended by Laws of Utah 2023, Chapter 516
24
25
Be it enacted by the Legislature of the state of Utah:
26
Section 1. Section 19-1-301.5 is amended to read:
27
19-1-301.5 . Permit review adjudicative proceedings.
28
(1) As used in this section: H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
29
(a) "Dispositive action" means a final agency action that:
30
(i) the executive director takes as part of a special adjudicative proceeding; and
31
(ii) is subject to judicial review, in accordance with Subsection (16).
32
(b) "Dispositive motion" means a motion that is equivalent to:
33
(i) a motion to dismiss under Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 12(b)(6);
34
(ii) a motion for judgment on the pleadings under Utah Rules of Civil Procedure,
35
Rule 12(c); or
36
(iii) a motion for summary judgment under Utah Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 56.
37
(c) "Financial assurance determination" means a decision on whether a facility, site,
38
plan, party, broker, owner, operator, generator, or permittee has met financial
39
assurance or financial responsibility requirements as determined by the director of the
40
Division of Waste Management and Radiation Control.
41
(d) "Party" means:
42
(i) the director who issued the permit order or financial assurance determination that
43
is being challenged in the special adjudicative proceeding under this section;
44
(ii) the permittee;
45
(iii) the person who applied for the permit, if the permit was denied;
46
(iv) the person who is subject to a financial assurance determination; or
47
(v) a person granted intervention by the administrative law judge.
48
(e) "Permit" means any of the following issued under this title:
49
(i) a permit;
50
(ii) a plan;
51
(iii) a license;
52
(iv) an approval order; or
53
(v) another administrative authorization made by a director.
54
(f)(i) "Permit order" means an order issued by a director that:
55
(A) approves a permit;
56
(B) renews a permit;
57
(C) denies a permit;
58
(D) modifies or amends a permit; or
59
(E) revokes and reissues a permit.
60
(ii) "Permit order" does not include an order terminating a permit.
61
(g) "Special adjudicative proceeding" means a proceeding under this section to resolve a
62
challenge to a:
- 2 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
63
(i) permit order; or
64
(ii) financial assurance determination.
65
(2) This section governs special adjudicative proceedings.
66
(3) Except as expressly provided in this section, the provisions of Title 63G, Chapter 4,
67
Administrative Procedures Act, do not apply to a special adjudicative proceeding under
68
this section.
69
(4) If a public comment period was provided during the permit application process or the
70
financial assurance determination process, a person who challenges an order or
71
determination may only raise an issue or argument during the special adjudicative
72
proceeding that:
73
(a) the person raised during the public comment period; and
74
(b) was supported with information or documentation that is cited with reasonable
75
specificity and sufficiently enables the director to fully consider the substance and
76
significance of the issue.
77
(5)(a) Upon request by a party, the executive director shall issue a notice of appointment
78
appointing an administrative law judge, in accordance with Subsections 19-1-301(5)
79
and (6), to conduct a special adjudicative proceeding under this section.
80
(b) The executive director shall issue a notice of appointment within 30 days after the
81
day on which a party files a request.
82
(c) A notice of appointment shall include:
83
(i) the agency's file number or other reference number assigned to the special
84
adjudicative proceeding;
85
(ii) the name of the special adjudicative proceeding; and
86
(iii) the administrative law judge's name, title, mailing address, email address, and
87
telephone number.
88
(6)(a) Only the following may file a petition for review of a permit order or financial
89
assurance determination:
90
(i) a party; or
91
(ii) a person who is seeking to intervene under Subsection (7).
92
(b) A person who files a petition for review of a permit order or a financial assurance
93
determination shall file the petition for review within 30 days after the day on which
94
the permit order or the financial assurance determination is issued.
95
(c) The department may, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative
96
Rulemaking Act, make rules allowing the extension of the filing deadline described
- 3 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
97
in Subsection (6)(b).
98
(d) A petition for review shall:
99
(i) be served in accordance with department rule;
100
(ii) include the name and address of each person to whom a copy of the petition for
101
review is sent;
102
(iii) if known, include the agency's file number or other reference number assigned to
103
the special adjudicative proceeding;
104
(iv) state the date on which the petition for review is served;
105
(v) include a statement of the petitioner's position, including, as applicable:
106
(A) the legal authority under which the petition for review is requested;
107
(B) the legal authority under which the agency has jurisdiction to review the
108
petition for review;
109
(C) each of the petitioner's arguments in support of the petitioner's requested relief;
110
(D) an explanation of how each argument described in Subsection (6)(d)(v)(C)
111
was preserved;
112
(E) a detailed description of any permit condition to which the petitioner is
113
objecting;
114
(F) any modification or addition to a permit that the petitioner is requesting;
115
(G) a demonstration that the agency's permit decision is based on a finding of fact
116
or conclusion of law that is clearly erroneous;
117
(H) if the agency director addressed a finding of fact or conclusion of law
118
described in Subsection (6)(d)(v)(G) in a response to public comment, a
119
citation to the comment and response that relates to the finding of fact or
120
conclusion of law and an explanation of why the director's response was
121
clearly erroneous or otherwise warrants review; and
122
(I) a claim for relief.
123
(e) A person may not raise an issue or argument in a petition for review unless the issue
124
or argument:
125
(i) was preserved in accordance with Subsection (4); or
126
(ii) was not reasonably ascertainable before or during the public comment period.
127
(f) To demonstrate that an issue or argument was preserved in accordance with
128
Subsection (4), a petitioner shall include the following in the petitioner's petition for
129
review:
130
(i) a citation to where the petitioner raised the issue or argument during the public
- 4 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
131
comment period; and
132
(ii) for each document upon which the petitioner relies in support of an issue or
133
argument, a description that:
134
(A) states why the document is part of the administrative record; and
135
(B) demonstrates that the petitioner cited the document with reasonable specificity
136
in accordance with Subsection (4)(b).
137
(7)(a) A person who is not a party may not participate in a special adjudicative
138
proceeding under this section unless the person is granted the right to intervene under
139
this Subsection (7).
140
(b) A person who seeks to intervene in a special adjudicative proceeding under this
141
section shall, within 30 days after the day on which the permit order or the financial
142
assurance determination being challenged was issued, file:
143
(i) a petition to intervene that:
144
(A) meets the requirements of Subsection 63G-4-207(1); and
145
(B) demonstrates that the person is entitled to intervention under Subsection
146
(7)(d)(ii); and
147
(ii) a timely petition for review.
148
(c) In a special adjudicative proceeding to review a permit order, the permittee is a party
149
to the special adjudicative proceeding regardless of who files the petition for review
150
and does not need to file a petition to intervene under Subsection (7)(b).
151
(d) An administrative law judge shall grant a petition to intervene in a special
152
adjudicative proceeding, if:
153
(i) the petition to intervene is timely filed; and
154
(ii) the petitioner:
155
(A) demonstrates that the petitioner's legal interests may be substantially affected
156
by the special adjudicative proceeding;
157
(B) demonstrates that the interests of justice and the orderly and prompt conduct
158
of the special adjudicative proceeding will not be materially impaired by
159
allowing the intervention; and
160
(C) in the petitioner's petition for review, raises issues or arguments that are
161
preserved in accordance with Subsection (4).
162
(e) An administrative law judge:
163
(i) shall issue an order granting or denying a petition to intervene in accordance with
164
Subsection 63G-4-207(3)(a); and
- 5 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
165
(ii) may impose conditions on intervenors as described in Subsections
166
63G-4-207(3)(b) and (c).
167
(f) The department may, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah Administrative
168
Rulemaking Act, make rules allowing the extension of the filing deadline described
169
in Subsection (7)(b).
170
(8)(a) Unless the parties otherwise agree, or the administrative law judge otherwise
171
orders, a special adjudicative proceeding shall be conducted as follows:
172
(i) the director shall file and serve the administrative record within 40 days after the
173
day on which the executive director issues a notice of appointment, unless
174
otherwise ordered by the administrative law judge;
175
(ii) any dispositive motion shall be filed and served within 15 days after the day on
176
which the administrative record is filed and served;
177
(iii) the petitioner shall file and serve an opening brief of no more than 30 pages:
178
(A) within 30 days after the day on which the director files and serves the
179
administrative record; or
180
(B) if a party files and serves a dispositive motion, within 30 days after the day on
181
which the administrative law judge issues a decision on the dispositive motion,
182
including a decision to defer the motion;
183
(iv) each responding party shall file and serve a response brief of no more than 30
184
pages within 15 days after the day on which the petitioner files and serves the
185
opening brief;
186
(v) the petitioner may file and serve a reply brief of not more than 15 pages within 15
187
days after the day on which the response brief is filed and served; and
188
(vi) if the petitioner files and serves a reply brief, each responding party may file and
189
serve a surreply brief of no more than 15 pages within five business days after the
190
day on which the petitioner files and serves the reply brief.
191
(b)(i) A reply brief may not raise an issue that was not raised in the response brief.
192
(ii) A surreply brief may not raise an issue that was not raised in the reply brief.
193
(9)(a) An administrative law judge shall conduct a special adjudicative proceeding based
194
only on the administrative record and not as a trial de novo.
195
(b) To the extent relative to the issues and arguments raised in the petition for review,
196
the administrative record consists of the following items, if they exist:
197
(i)(A) for review of a permit order, the permit application, draft permit, and final
198
permit; or
- 6 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
199
(B) for review of a financial assurance determination, the proposed financial
200
assurance determination from the owner or operator of the facility, the draft
201
financial assurance determination, and the final financial assurance
202
determination;
203
(ii) each statement of basis, fact sheet, engineering review, or other substantive
204
explanation designated by the director as part of the basis for the decision relating
205
to the permit order or the financial assurance determination;
206
(iii) the notice and record of each public comment period;
207
(iv) the notice and record of each public hearing, including oral comments made
208
during the public hearing;
209
(v) written comments submitted during the public comment period;
210
(vi) responses to comments that are designated by the director as part of the basis for
211
the decision relating to the permit order or the financial assurance determination;
212
(vii) any information that is:
213
(A) requested by and submitted to the director; and
214
(B) designated by the director as part of the basis for the decision relating to the
215
permit order or the financial assurance determination;
216
(viii) any additional information specified by rule;
217
(ix) any additional documents agreed to by the parties; and
218
(x) information supplementing the record under Subsection (9)(c).
219
(c)(i) There is a rebuttable presumption against supplementing the record.
220
(ii) A party may move to supplement the record described in Subsection (9)(b) with
221
technical or factual information.
222
(iii) The administrative law judge may grant a motion to supplement the record
223
described in Subsection (9)(b) with technical or factual information if the moving
224
party proves that:
225
(A) good cause exists for supplementing the record;
226
(B) supplementing the record is in the interest of justice; and
227
(C) supplementing the record is necessary for resolution of the issues.
228
(iv) The department may, in accordance with Title 63G, Chapter 3, Utah
229
Administrative Rulemaking Act, make rules permitting further supplementation of
230
the record.
231
(10)(a) Except as otherwise provided by this section, the administrative law judge shall
232
review and respond to a petition for review in accordance with Subsections
- 7 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
233
63G-4-201(3)(d) and (e), following the relevant procedures for formal adjudicative
234
proceedings.
235
(b) The administrative law judge shall require the parties to file responsive briefs in
236
accordance with Subsection (8).
237
(c) If an administrative law judge enters an order of default against a party, the
238
administrative law judge shall enter the order of default in accordance with Section
239
63G-4-209.
240
(d) The administrative law judge, in conducting a special adjudicative proceeding:
241
(i) may not participate in an ex parte communication with a party to the special
242
adjudicative proceeding regarding the merits of the special adjudicative
243
proceeding unless notice and an opportunity to be heard are afforded to all parties;
244
and
245
(ii) shall, upon receiving an ex parte communication, place the communication in the
246
public record of the proceeding and afford all parties an opportunity to comment
247
on the information.
248
(e) In conducting a special adjudicative proceeding, the administrative law judge may
249
take judicial notice of matters not in the administrative record, in accordance with
250
Utah Rules of Evidence, Rule 201.
251
(f) An administrative law judge may take any action in a special adjudicative proceeding
252
that is not a dispositive action.
253
(11)(a) A person who files a petition for review has the burden of demonstrating that an
254
issue or argument raised in the petition for review has been preserved in accordance
255
with Subsection (4).
256
(b) The administrative law judge shall dismiss, with prejudice, any issue or argument
257
raised in a petition for review that has not been preserved in accordance with
258
Subsection (4).
259
(12) In response to a dispositive motion, within 45 days after the day on which oral
260
argument takes place, or, if there is no oral argument, within 45 days after the day on
261
which the reply brief on the dispositive motion is due, the administrative law judge shall:
262
(a) submit a proposed dispositive action to the executive director recommending full or
263
partial resolution of the special adjudicative proceeding, that includes:
264
(i) written findings of fact;
265
(ii) written conclusions of law; and
266
(iii) a recommended order; or
- 8 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
267
(b) if the administrative law judge determines that a full or partial resolution of the
268
special adjudicative proceeding is not appropriate, issue an order that explains the
269
basis for the administrative law judge's determination.
270
(13) For each issue or argument that is not dismissed or otherwise resolved under
271
Subsection (11)(b) or (12), the administrative law judge shall:
272
(a) provide the parties an opportunity for briefing and oral argument in accordance with
273
this section;
274
(b) conduct a review of the director's order or determination, based on the record
275
described in Subsections (9)(b), (9)(c), and (10)(e); and
276
(c) within 60 days after the day on which the reply brief on the dispositive motion is due,
277
submit to the executive director a proposed dispositive action, that includes:
278
(i) written findings of fact;
279
(ii) written conclusions of law; and
280
(iii) a recommended order.
281
(14)(a) When the administrative law judge submits a proposed dispositive action to the
282
executive director, the executive director may:
283
(i) adopt, adopt with modifications, or reject the proposed dispositive action; or
284
(ii) return the proposed dispositive action to the administrative law judge for further
285
action as directed.
286
(b) On review of a proposed dispositive action, the executive director shall uphold all
287
factual, technical, and scientific agency determinations that are not clearly erroneous
288
based on the petitioner's marshaling of the evidence.
289
(c) In reviewing a proposed dispositive action during a special adjudicative proceeding,
290
the executive director may take judicial notice of matters not in the record, in
291
accordance with Utah Rules of Evidence, Rule 201.
292
(d) The executive director may use the executive director's technical expertise in making
293
a determination.
294
(15)(a) Except as provided in Subsection (15)(b), the executive director may not
295
participate in an ex parte communication with a party to a special adjudicative
296
proceeding regarding the merits of the special adjudicative proceeding, unless notice
297
and opportunity to be heard are afforded to all parties involved in the proceeding.
298
(b) The executive director may discuss ongoing operational matters that require the
299
involvement of a division director without violating Subsection (15)(a).
300
(c) Upon receiving an ex parte communication from a party to a proceeding, the
- 9 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
301
executive director shall place the communication in the public record of the
302
proceeding and afford all parties to the proceeding with an opportunity to comment
303
on the communication.
304
(16)(a) A party may seek judicial review in the Utah Court of Appeals of a dispositive
305
action in a special adjudicative proceeding, in accordance with Sections 63G-4-401,
306
63G-4-403, and 63G-4-405.
307
(b) An appellate court shall limit its review of a dispositive action of a special
308
adjudicative proceeding under this section to:
309
(i) the record described in Subsections (9)(b), (9)(c), (10)(e), and (14)(c); and
310
(ii) the record made by the administrative law judge and the executive director during
311
the special adjudicative proceeding.
312
(c) During judicial review of a dispositive action, the appellate court shall:
313
(i) review all agency determinations in accordance with Subsection [63G-4-403(4)]
314
63G-4-403(5), recognizing that the agency has been granted substantial discretion
315
to interpret its governing statutes and rules; and
316
(ii) uphold all factual, technical, and scientific agency determinations that are not
317
clearly erroneous based upon the petitioner's marshaling of the evidence.
318
(17)(a) The filing of a petition for review does not:
319
(i) stay a permit order or a financial assurance determination; or
320
(ii) delay the effective date of a permit order or a portion of a financial assurance
321
determination.
322
(b) A permit order or a financial assurance determination may not be stayed or delayed
323
unless a stay is granted under this Subsection (17).
324
(c) The administrative law judge shall:
325
(i) consider a party's motion to stay a permit order or a financial assurance
326
determination during a special adjudicative proceeding; and
327
(ii) within 45 days after the day on which the reply brief on the motion to stay is due,
328
submit a proposed determination on the stay to the executive director.
329
(d) The administrative law judge may not recommend to the executive director a stay of
330
a permit order or a financial assurance determination, or a portion of a permit order
331
or a portion of a financial assurance determination, unless:
332
(i) all parties agree to the stay; or
333
(ii) the party seeking the stay demonstrates that:
334
(A) the party seeking the stay will suffer irreparable harm unless the stay is issued;
- 10 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
335
(B) the threatened injury to the party seeking the stay outweighs whatever damage
336
the proposed stay is likely to cause the party restrained or enjoined;
337
(C) the stay, if issued, would not be adverse to the public interest; and
338
(D) there is a substantial likelihood that the party seeking the stay will prevail on
339
the merits of the underlying claim, or the case presents serious issues on the
340
merits, which should be the subject of further adjudication.
341
(e) A party may appeal the executive director's decision regarding a stay of a permit
342
order or a financial assurance determination to the Utah Court of Appeals, in
343
accordance with Section 78A-4-103.
344
(18)(a) Subject to Subsection (18)(c), the administrative law judge shall issue a written
345
response to a non-dispositive motion within 45 days after the day on which the reply
346
brief on the non-dispositive motion is due or, if the administrative law judge grants
347
oral argument on the non-dispositive motion, within 45 days after the day on which
348
oral argument takes place.
349
(b) If the administrative law judge determines that the administrative law judge needs
350
more time to issue a response to a non-dispositive motion, the administrative law
351
judge may issue a response after the deadline described in Subsection (18)(a) if,
352
before the deadline expires, the administrative law judge gives notice to the parties
353
that includes:
354
(i) the amount of additional time that the administrative law judge requires; and
355
(ii) the reason the administrative law judge needs the additional time.
356
(c) If the administrative law judge grants oral argument on a non-dispositive motion, the
357
administrative law judge shall hold the oral argument within 30 days after the day on
358
which the reply brief on the non-dispositive motion is due.
359
Section 2. Section 59-1-205 is amended to read:
360
59-1-205 . Chairman -- Quorum -- Voting -- Sessions.
361
(1) The governor shall designate one of the members of the commission as chairperson.
362
(2)(a) Three members of the commission constitute a quorum for the transaction of
363
business.
364
(b) A quorum of the commission must participate in any order that constitutes a final
365
agency action, as described in Section 63G-4-403, on:
366
(i) a formal adjudicative proceeding over which the commission has jurisdiction;
367
(ii) an informal adjudicative proceeding over which the commission has jurisdiction;
368
or
- 11 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
369
(iii) an initial hearing conducted pursuant to Section 59-1-502.5.
370
(c) If a commission vote results in a tie vote on any matter described in Subsection (2)(b),
371
the position of the taxpayer is considered to have prevailed.
372
(3) The commission shall be in session and open for the transaction of business during
373
ordinary business hours each day.
374
(4) The commission may hold sessions or conduct investigations at any place in the state to
375
facilitate the performance of its duties.
376
Section 3. Section 63G-4-302 is amended to read:
377
63G-4-302 . Agency review -- Reconsideration.
378
(1)(a) Within 20 days after the date that an order is issued for which review by the
379
agency or by a superior agency under Section 63G-4-301 is unavailable, and if the
380
order would otherwise constitute final agency action as described in Section
381
63G-4-403, any party may file a written request for reconsideration with the agency,
382
stating the specific grounds upon which relief is requested.
383
(b) Unless otherwise provided by statute, the filing of the request is not a prerequisite for
384
seeking judicial review of the order.
385
(2) The request for reconsideration shall be filed with the agency and one copy shall be
386
mailed to each party by the person making the request.
387
(3)(a) The agency head, or a person designated for that purpose, shall issue a written
388
order granting the request or denying the request.
389
(b) If the agency head or the person designated for that purpose does not issue an order
390
within 20 days after the filing of the request, the request for reconsideration shall be
391
considered to be denied.
392
Section 4. Section 63G-4-401 is amended to read:
393
63G-4-401 . Judicial review -- Exhaustion of administrative remedies -- Petition
394
for judicial review.
395
(1) A party aggrieved may obtain judicial review of final agency action, as described in
396
Section 63G-4-403, except in actions where judicial review is expressly prohibited by
397
statute.
398
(2) A party may seek judicial review only after exhausting all administrative remedies
399
available, except that:
400
(a) a party seeking judicial review need not exhaust administrative remedies if this
401
chapter or any other statute states that exhaustion is not required;
402
(b) the court may relieve a party seeking judicial review of the requirement to exhaust
- 12 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
403
any or all administrative remedies if:
404
(i) the administrative remedies are inadequate; or
405
(ii) exhaustion of remedies would result in irreparable harm disproportionate to the
406
public benefit derived from requiring exhaustion.
407
(3)(a) Except as provided in Subsection (3)(c), a party shall file a petition for judicial
408
review of final agency action within 30 days after the day on which the order:
409
(i) constituting the final agency action is issued; or
410
(ii) is considered to have been issued under Subsection 63G-4-302(3)(b).
411
(b) The petition shall:
412
(i) name the agency and all other appropriate parties as respondents; and
413
(ii) meet the form requirements specified in this chapter.
414
(c) If a party files a petition for judicial review of a final agency action resulting from a
415
formal adjudicative proceeding within the 30-day time period described in
416
Subsection (3)(a), any other party to the action may file a petition for judicial review
417
if the petition is filed within the time period permitted for a cross petition under Rule
418
14 of the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure.
419
Section 5. Section 63G-4-403 is amended to read:
420
63G-4-403 . Judicial review -- Formal adjudicative proceedings -- Final agency
421
action.
422
(1) As provided by statute, the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to
423
review [all] a final agency action resulting from a formal adjudicative [proceedings as]
424
proceeding originating from an entity described in Sections 78A-3-102 and 78A-4-103.
425
(2) An order or decree from a formal adjudicative proceeding is a final agency action if:
426
(a) the administrative decision-making has reached a stage where judicial review will
427
not disrupt the orderly process of adjudication;
428
(b) rights or obligations have been determined by, or legal consequences flow from, the
429
order or decree; and
430
(c) the order or decree, in whole or in part, is not preliminary, preparatory, procedural, or
431
intermediate with regard to subsequent agency action.
432
[(2)] (3)(a) To seek judicial review of final agency action resulting from formal
433
adjudicative proceedings, the petitioner shall file a petition for review of agency
434
action with the appropriate appellate court in the form required by the appellate rules
435
of the appropriate appellate court.
436
(b) The appellate rules of the appropriate appellate court shall govern all additional
- 13 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
437
filings and proceedings in the appellate court.
438
[(3)] (4) The contents, transmittal, and filing of the agency's record for judicial review of
439
formal adjudicative proceedings are governed by the Utah Rules of Appellate Procedure,
440
except that:
441
(a) all parties to the review proceedings may stipulate to shorten, summarize, or organize
442
the record; and
443
(b) the appellate court may tax the cost of preparing transcripts and copies for the record:
444
(i) against a party who unreasonably refuses to stipulate to shorten, summarize, or
445
organize the record; or
446
(ii) according to any other provision of law.
447
[(4)] (5) The appellate court shall grant relief only if, on the basis of the agency's record, it
448
determines that a person seeking judicial review has been substantially prejudiced by
449
any of the following:
450
(a) the agency action, or the statute or rule on which the agency action is based, is
451
unconstitutional on its face or as applied;
452
(b) the agency has acted beyond the jurisdiction conferred by any statute;
453
(c) the agency has not decided all of the issues requiring resolution;
454
(d) the agency has erroneously interpreted or applied the law;
455
(e) the agency has engaged in an unlawful procedure or decision-making process, or has
456
failed to follow prescribed procedure;
457
(f) the persons taking the agency action were illegally constituted as a decision-making
458
body or were subject to disqualification;
459
(g) the agency action is based upon a determination of fact, made or implied by the
460
agency, that is not supported by substantial evidence when viewed in light of the
461
whole record before the court; or
462
(h) the agency action is:
463
(i) an abuse of the discretion delegated to the agency by statute;
464
(ii) contrary to a rule of the agency;
465
(iii) contrary to the agency's prior practice, unless the agency justifies the
466
inconsistency by giving facts and reasons that demonstrate a fair and rational basis
467
for the inconsistency; or
468
(iv) otherwise arbitrary or capricious.
469
Section 6. Section 78A-3-102 is amended to read:
470
78A-3-102 . Supreme Court jurisdiction.
- 14 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
471
(1) The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to answer questions of state law certified
472
by a court of the United States.
473
(2) The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction to issue all extraordinary writs and
474
authority to issue all writs and process necessary to carry into effect its orders,
475
judgments, and decrees or in aid of its jurisdiction.
476
(3) The Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction, including jurisdiction of interlocutory
477
appeals, over:
478
(a) a judgment of the Court of Appeals;
479
(b) cases certified to the Supreme Court by the Court of Appeals prior to final judgment
480
by the Court of Appeals;
481
(c) discipline of lawyers;
482
(d) final orders of the Judicial Conduct Commission;
483
(e) [final orders and decrees in formal adjudicative proceedings] a final agency action, as
484
described in Section 63G-4-403, in a formal adjudicative proceeding originating [with]
485
from:
486
(i) the Public Service Commission;
487
(ii) the State Tax Commission;
488
(iii) the School and Institutional Trust Lands Board of Trustees;
489
(iv) the Board of Oil, Gas, and Mining;
490
(v) the state engineer; or
491
(vi) the executive director of the Department of Natural Resources reviewing actions
492
of the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands;
493
(f) final orders and decrees of the district court review of informal adjudicative
494
proceedings of agencies under Subsection (3)(e);
495
(g) a final judgment or decree of any court of record holding a statute of the United
496
States or this state unconstitutional on its face under the Constitution of the United
497
States or the Utah Constitution;
498
(h) interlocutory appeals from any court of record involving a charge of a first degree or
499
capital felony;
500
(i) appeals from the district court involving a conviction or charge of a first degree
501
felony or capital felony;
502
(j) orders, judgments, and decrees of any court of record over which the Court of
503
Appeals does not have original appellate jurisdiction; and
504
(k) appeals from the district court of orders, judgments, or decrees ruling on legislative
- 15 - H.B. 73 Enrolled Copy
505
subpoenas.
506
(4) The Supreme Court may transfer to the Court of Appeals any of the matters over which
507
the Supreme Court has original appellate jurisdiction, except:
508
(a) capital felony convictions or an appeal of an interlocutory order of a court of record
509
involving a charge of a capital felony;
510
(b) election and voting contests;
511
(c) reapportionment of election districts;
512
(d) retention or removal of public officers;
513
(e) matters involving legislative subpoenas; and
514
(f) those matters described in Subsections (3)(a) through (d).
515
(5) The Supreme Court has sole discretion in granting or denying a petition for writ of
516
certiorari for the review of a Court of Appeals adjudication, but the Supreme Court shall
517
review those cases certified to it by the Court of Appeals under Subsection (3)(b).
518
(6) The Supreme Court shall comply with the requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 4,
519
Administrative Procedures Act, in its review of agency adjudicative proceedings.
520
Section 7. Section 78A-4-103 is amended to read:
521
78A-4-103 . Court of Appeals jurisdiction.
522
(1) As used in this section, "adjudicative proceeding" does not include a proceeding under
523
Title 63G, Chapter 2, Part 4, Appeals, that precedes judicial review under Section
524
63G-2-404.
525
(2) The Court of Appeals has jurisdiction to issue all extraordinary writs and to issue all
526
writs and process necessary:
527
(a) to carry into effect its judgments, orders, and decrees; or
528
(b) in aid of its jurisdiction.
529
(3) The Court of Appeals has appellate jurisdiction, including jurisdiction of interlocutory
530
appeals, over:
531
(a)(i) a final [order or decree resulting from] agency action, as described in Section
532
63G-4-403, originating from:
533
(A) a formal adjudicative proceeding of a state agency;
534
(B) a special adjudicative proceeding, as described in Section 19-1-301.5; or
535
(C) a hearing before a local school board or the State Board of Education as
536
described in Section 53G-11-515; or
537
(ii) an appeal from the district court review of an informal adjudicative proceeding of
538
an agency other than the following:
- 16 - Enrolled Copy H.B. 73
539
(A) the Public Service Commission;
540
(B) the State Tax Commission;
541
(C) the School and Institutional Trust Lands Board of Trustees;
542
(D) the Division of Forestry, Fire, and State Lands, for an action reviewed by the
543
executive director of the Department of Natural Resources;
544
(E) the Board of Oil, Gas, and Mining; or
545
(F) the state engineer;
546
(b) appeals from the district court review of:
547
(i) adjudicative proceedings of agencies of political subdivisions of the state or other
548
local agencies; and
549
(ii) a challenge to agency action under Section 63G-3-602;
550
(c) appeals from the juvenile courts;
551
(d) interlocutory appeals from any court of record in criminal cases, except those
552
involving a charge of a first degree or capital felony;
553
(e) appeals from a court of record in criminal cases, except those involving a conviction
554
or charge of a first degree felony or capital felony;
555
(f) appeals from orders on petitions for extraordinary writs sought by persons who are
556
incarcerated or serving any other criminal sentence, except petitions constituting a
557
challenge to a conviction of or the sentence for a first degree or capital felony;
558
(g) appeals from the orders on petitions for extraordinary writs challenging the decisions
559
of the Board of Pardons and Parole except in cases involving a first degree or capital
560
felony;
561
(h) appeals from district court involving domestic relations cases, including, but not
562
limited to, divorce, annulment, property division, child custody, support, parent-time,
563
visitation, adoption, and paternity;
564
(i) appeals from the Utah Military Court; and
565
(j) cases transferred to the Court of Appeals from the Supreme Court.
566
(4) The Court of Appeals upon its own motion only and by the vote of four judges of the
567
court may certify to the Supreme Court for original appellate review and determination
568
any matter over which the Court of Appeals has original appellate jurisdiction.
569
(5) The Court of Appeals shall comply with the requirements of Title 63G, Chapter 4,
570
Administrative Procedures Act, in its review of agency adjudicative proceedings.
571
Section 8. Effective Date.
572
This bill takes effect on May 7, 2025.
- 17 -