Virginia House Bill HB739

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/22
• Refer: 1/11/22

Caption

Shoreline improvements, existing; repair and maintenance.

Impact

The passage of HB 739 is expected to significantly alter current state laws regarding shoreline management and wetland usage. By prioritizing living shorelines, the bill seeks to replace traditional, less sustainable shoreline stabilization methods with practices that enhance natural habitats. This shift not only aligns with contemporary environmental standards but also supports local ecosystems by restoring habitats that may have been adversely affected by human activities. The bill's emphasis on using best available science to guide management decisions will likely improve the overall health of Virginia’s coastal environments.

Summary

House Bill 739 focuses on improving shoreline management within the Commonwealth of Virginia by promoting the use of living shorelines as the preferred method for stabilizing tidal shorelines. This initiative aims to enhance coastal resilience while providing erosion control and water quality benefits. The bill mandates that the Virginia Marine Resources Commission, in partnership with relevant state and local agencies, develops comprehensive guidance for shoreline management systems and establishes a streamlined permit process for shoreline project approvals. This legislative effort reflects the urgent need to address environmental challenges associated with coastline erosion and habitat degradation.

Contention

Some notable points of contention surrounding HB 739 include concerns about the limitations placed on property owners when conducting shoreline maintenance or improvements. Critics argue that the requirement to use living shorelines exclusively could restrict property rights and complicate existing practices for managing shorelines, especially if site conditions do not support this method. Furthermore, apprehensions exist regarding the effectiveness of living shorelines compared to more conventional methods, particularly in areas facing severe erosion. Proponents highlight that the environmental benefits far outweigh these limitations, advocating for a sustainable future and enhanced local ecosystems.