Virginia House Bill HB855

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/22
• Refer: 1/12/22

Caption

Comprehensive plan approval; appeal shall be heard and determined within 100 days, etc.

Impact

The bill's provisions directly affect how local governments will handle submissions related to comprehensive plans and public utility projects. By mandating a 100-day resolution period for appeals, the legislation aims to enhance predictability and stability for both local authorities and developers. Furthermore, it streamlines the approval process for telecommunications facilities and solar energy projects by deeming them compliant with comprehensive planning if they meet certain zoning criteria. This is intended to promote both economic development and renewable energy projects, supporting Virginia's initiatives towards sustainable infrastructure.

Summary

House Bill 855 proposes amendments to the legal framework surrounding comprehensive plans adopted by local planning commissions in Virginia. The bill emphasizes the importance of having a structured process for approvals related to public works and utilities, specifically within the local governance framework. It introduces a definitive timeline for appeals regarding planning commission decisions, requiring that appeals be heard and resolved within 100 days to ensure timely responses to community needs and development projects. This time frame aims at increasing efficiency in local governance and minimizing delays in planning and development processes.

Contention

Notably, the legislation has sparked discussions regarding the balance of power between state and local governments. Supporters assert that the bill fosters a more efficient and coordinated approach to development, aligning with broader state policies on utility and infrastructure expansion. However, critics express concern that such mandates could undermine local control and the ability of municipalities to address specific community needs effectively. There are apprehensions that the expedited processes may gloss over critical local interests and environmental considerations, leading to conflicts between local priorities and state-directed outcomes.