Virginia House Bill HJR454

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/10/22
• Engrossed: 3/10/22
• Refer: 3/10/22
• Enrolled: 3/12/22
• Passed: 3/12/22

Caption

Judge; election in circuit court.

Impact

If enacted, HJR454 would affect the political landscape by establishing a formalized electoral process for appointing judges, which is significant for establishing accountability within the judiciary. The resolution stipulates how nominations will be made and counted, highlighting transparency and collaboration between the two houses of the General Assembly. The implications of this amendment could lead to more localized control over judicial appointments, shifting away from potential gubernatorial appointments or other centralized methods of judicial selection.

Summary

HJR454 proposes an amendment to allow for the election of a Circuit Court judge for the Twelfth Judicial Circuit, with a defined term of eight years. The bill highlights a procedural approach to judicial nominations, detailing the roles of the House and Senate in this election process. The intent of this legislation is to enhance democratic participation in the judicial selection process, aiming to ensure that judges are accountable to the electorate within their respective circuits.

Sentiment

General sentiment around HJR454 appears to be favorable, as evidenced by the unanimous support in the Senate where it was agreed to with a vote of 40-0. Supporters likely view this bill as a positive move towards increasing citizen engagement in the judiciary, thereby enhancing trust in the judicial system. The lack of opposition suggests a strong consensus among legislators regarding the benefits of elected judges and the desire to promote democratic processes in judicial appointments.

Contention

While the voting history indicates no explicit contention, potential concerns from detractors could arise regarding electoral influence on judicial impartiality. Critics might argue that election pressures could compromise judges' independence, with the necessity to campaign potentially impacting their judicial conduct. This broader discussion on the balance between accountability and independence in the judiciary remains an important factor to monitor as this bill progresses.