Virginia Senate Bill SB88

Virginia 2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/5/22
• Refer: 1/5/22
• Report Pass: 2/8/22
• Engrossed: 2/14/22
• Refer: 2/22/22
• Report Pass: 3/2/22
• Engrossed: 3/7/22
• Engrossed: 3/8/22
• Enrolled: 3/10/22
• Chaptered: 4/5/22
• Passed: 4/5/22

Caption

Breeders of cats and dogs; records of animals sold or transferred to animal testing facility.

Impact

The implementation of SB88 is expected to create a more structured environment for the breeding of dogs and cats intended for experimental purposes. By requiring detailed record-keeping, the legislation aims to promote transparency and discourage potential unethical practices associated with the breeding and sale of these animals. It empowers enforcement agencies like local animal control and law enforcement to monitor compliance, thereby ensuring that breeders adhere to humane treatment standards while also safeguarding public health and welfare.

Summary

SB88 introduces new regulations regarding the breeding of cats and dogs for experimental purposes in Virginia. The bill mandates that any entity or individual engaged in the breeding of these animals for sale to animal testing facilities must maintain comprehensive records for a period of five years. The records are intended to ensure traceability of the animals bred, covering details from their acquisition to their ultimate fate, which includes transfers or euthanasia. This approach seeks to enhance accountability and oversight in the breeding process, particularly concerning animals used for research and testing purposes, fostering greater compliance with federal regulations under the Animal Welfare Act.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB88 appears to be generally positive, particularly among advocacy groups and animal welfare organizations that support increased accountability in the breeding industry. Proponents argue that the bill will lead to better treatment and consideration of animal welfare within the breeding for research context. However, there may be some concerns raised by breeders about the burden of compliance and the administrative challenges posed by stringent record-keeping requirements. Overall, the conversation suggests a shared commitment to improving standards in animal breeding while recognizing the need for balance between regulation and industry operation.

Contention

Notable points of contention may revolve around the operational impacts on breeders who may view the record-keeping provisions as overly burdensome. Some might argue that the bill could impose additional costs and administrative duties that may not be feasible for smaller operations. Moreover, there could be debates about the effectiveness of such regulations in genuinely changing practices within the industry versus simply increasing oversight without addressing underlying issues related to animal care and welfare. Overall, while SB88 aims to enhance transparency and protect animal welfare, the practical implications for breeders and compliance may lead to ongoing discussions about the appropriate regulatory framework.