Virginia House Bill HB2332

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/23
• Refer: 1/12/23
• Report Pass: 1/31/23
• Refer: 1/31/23
• Report Pass: 2/3/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/8/23
• Report Pass: 2/15/23
• Report Pass: 2/16/23
• Enrolled: 2/24/23
• Vetoed: 5/12/23

Caption

Virginia Economic Development Partnership Authority; eligible site for site development grant.

Impact

The implementation of HB2332 is expected to significantly impact state laws relating to economic development and site qualification for grants. The bill redefines what constitutes an eligible site for development grants and establishes criteria for funding, aimed at maximizing the potential for job creation and economic activity in various regions of Virginia. With the criteria adjusted to favor sites with at least 50 contiguous acres under certain conditions, the bill broadens the opportunities for smaller localities to benefit from state economic development initiatives.

Summary

House Bill 2332 aims to enhance the economic development framework in Virginia through the establishment of the Virginia Business Ready Sites Program Fund. This bill creates a structure for providing competitive grants for site characterization and development to promote project-ready sites across the Commonwealth. An eligible site is defined as at least 100 contiguous acres suitable for industrial or commercial purposes, focusing on enhancing Virginia's appeal to businesses looking to establish or expand operations within the state.

Sentiment

The sentiment around HB2332 is generally positive among proponents of economic development, particularly within the business community. Supporters perceive the bill as a crucial step in facilitating faster and more efficient development of business sites, which could lead to job creation and improved economic standings for the regions. However, opponents may raise concerns about the effectiveness of such grants and the allocation process, which could lead to skepticism about their equitable distribution and impact.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the mechanics of grant distribution and the requirement for matching funds. The bill mandates that grant recipients enter a performance agreement, which may impose additional burdens on local governments or smaller communities. Critics might argue that the requirement for matching funds could limit access to grants for less affluent localities, raising concerns about equitable economic development across different areas of Virginia.