Virginia Senate Bill SB1448

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/11/23
• Refer: 1/11/23
• Report Pass: 2/2/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/7/23
• Report Pass: 2/8/23
• Engrossed: 2/13/23
• Engrossed: 2/24/23
• Enrolled: 3/7/23
• Chaptered: 3/27/23
• Passed: 3/27/23

Caption

Norfolk State University & Va. State University; reduced rate tuition charges for certain students.

Impact

The impact of this bill is significant as it targets the tuition structure for non-Virginia students attending these institutions, potentially increasing enrollment in programs that align with labor market demands. By offering reduced rates, the bill not only aims to attract a broader pool of applicants from outside of Virginia but also addresses workforce needs in critical industries. It thus aligns educational outcomes with economic development objectives in the state.

Summary

SB1448 aims to amend the Code of Virginia by introducing a provision for reduced rate tuition charges at Norfolk State University and Virginia State University for certain non-Virginia students. The bill specifically targets students who have completed at least 30 credit hours in programs that lead to employment in high-demand fields. This initiative seeks to make higher education more accessible and incentivize students to pursue careers in areas deemed critical for the state's economy.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB1448 appears to be largely positive among lawmakers and educational stakeholders. Supporters view this as a proactive measure to enhance educational opportunities for out-of-state students while addressing workforce shortages in high-demand sectors. However, potential concerns could arise regarding the differentiation in tuition rates between in-state and out-of-state students, which may fuel debates on equity and access in higher education.

Contention

Notable points of contention may stem from the stipulation that non-Virginia students will lose their reduced tuition rate if they switch to programs not aligned with high-demand fields. This condition raises questions about the appropriateness of penalizing students for career changes or shifts in academic interest. Furthermore, there could be debates about the financial implications for the universities and how this may affect funding and resources allocated to in-state students.