Virginia Senate Bill SB1486

Virginia 2023 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/23
• Refer: 1/19/23
• Report Pass: 1/30/23
• Report Pass: 2/2/23
• Engrossed: 2/6/23
• Refer: 2/10/23
• Report Pass: 2/17/23
• Refer: 2/17/23
• Report Pass: 2/20/23
• Enrolled: 3/7/23
• Chaptered: 3/23/23
• Passed: 3/23/23

Caption

Judges, retired, etc.; increases per diem compensation for substitute judges.

Impact

The passage of SB1486 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws pertaining to judicial compensations. By increasing the daily rate for substitute judges, the state aims to better attract qualified judges back into the system, thereby enhancing the efficiency of court operations and potentially improving the overall justice experience. This change is designed to acknowledge the valuable contributions that retired judges make and provide them with a compensation structure reflective of their expertise.

Summary

SB1486, also known as the bill to amend payments for services of retired judges in Virginia, proposes to increase the per diem compensation for substitute judges from $200 to $400 for each day they are recalled to service. This legislation aims to address the financial considerations of retired judges who temporarily serve, ensuring they are adequately compensated for their expertise and service during these periods. The bill emphasizes the importance of having experienced judges available who can step in when needed, especially as the judicial system often relies on retired judges to fill gaps due to shortages or ongoing trials.

Sentiment

General sentiment around SB1486 appears to be largely positive, with recognition of the necessity to support retired judges who continue to serve in a temporary capacity. There may be slight reservations regarding budgetary impacts, but the overarching view seems to emphasize the importance of maintaining quality judicial service through adequate compensation. Stakeholders involved in the judicial and legislative process seem to appreciate the bill's intent to promote judicial effectiveness and support retired judges.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support from various legislative members and legal communities, some potential points of contention could arise regarding the financial implications of increasing the per diem. Critics may raise concerns about the source of funding for this increase and whether it might divert resources from other critical areas within the state budget. Ensuring the sustainability of this new compensation structure without compromising other services will be crucial as discussions progress.